Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 18 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 75 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 149 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 202 |
Descriptor
| Revision (Written Composition) | 403 |
| Writing Evaluation | 403 |
| Writing Instruction | 243 |
| Writing Processes | 129 |
| Teaching Methods | 122 |
| Feedback (Response) | 121 |
| Higher Education | 96 |
| Writing Improvement | 96 |
| Writing Skills | 95 |
| Peer Evaluation | 94 |
| Second Language Learning | 93 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Wilson, Joshua | 6 |
| Litman, Diane | 5 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 5 |
| Allen, Laura K. | 4 |
| Roscoe, Rod D. | 4 |
| Schunn, Christian D. | 4 |
| Johnson, Adam C. | 3 |
| Rijlaarsdam, Gert | 3 |
| Saeed, Murad Abdu | 3 |
| Beard, Gaysha | 2 |
| Berkenkotter, Carol | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 57 |
| Teachers | 47 |
| Researchers | 5 |
| Students | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
Location
| China | 22 |
| Iran | 6 |
| Taiwan | 6 |
| Canada | 4 |
| Vietnam | 4 |
| Indonesia | 3 |
| Japan | 3 |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 |
| South Korea | 3 |
| Turkey | 3 |
| Algeria | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 3 |
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
| General Educational… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Han Zhang; Jamie Costley; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Depending on the nature of comments made during peer review of academic writing, students may be able to evaluate and revise their performance. Therefore, it is essential to explore how the content of comments affects student writing. Since peer review is a process of interaction, it is critical to understand how comments affect student academic…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Content Area Writing, Academic Language, Feedback (Response)
Xiaomei Wang – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) provides an instant and cost-effective alternative to human feedback in assessing student writing, and therefore is widely used as a pedagogical supportive tool in writing instruction. However, studies on how students perceive the usage of AWE as a surrogate writing tutor in out-of-class autonomous learning are…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Undergraduate Students
Lifang Bai; Yijia Wei – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Yuan Shen; Luzhen Tang; Huixiao Le; Shufang Tan; Yueying Zhao; Kejie Shen; Xinyu Li; Torsten Juelich; Qiong Wang; Dragan Gaševic; Yizhou Fan – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
Ethical considerations have become a central topic in education since artificial intelligence (AI) brought both great innovation and challenges to educational practices and systems. Values influence what we believe is morally right and guide how we behave ethically in different situations. However, there is limited empirical research on improving…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Facilitators (Individuals), Ethics
Aranzazu Bea Reyes; Carmen Rodríguez-Gonzalo – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
The importance of revision has been recognised by numerous scholars of the teaching and learning of writing (Abad & Rodríguez-Gonzalo, 2023; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1987; Camps, 2020; Horning & Becker, 2006), especially if it is understood as a recursive and transversal phase that affects all levels of language (Álvarez Angulo, 2011;…
Descriptors: College Students, Collaborative Writing, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Kai Guo; Emily Di Zhang; Danling Li; Shulin Yu – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
As a vital learning activity in second language (L2) writing classrooms, peer feedback plays a crucial role in improving students' writing skills. However, student reviewers face challenges in providing impactful feedback on peers' essays. Low-quality peer reviews emerge as a persistent problem, adversely affecting the learning effect of peer…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Christopher Mah; Mei Tan; Lena Phalen; Alexa Sparks; Dorottya Demszky – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2025
Effective writing feedback is a powerful tool for enhancing student learning, encouraging revision, and increasing motivation and agency. Yet, teachers face many challenges that prevent them from consistently providing effective writing feedback. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have led educators and researchers to…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing, Writing Evaluation
Hetian Yu; Qin Xie – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2025
Generative AI has stormed the education community worldwide. Gen-AI's potential to assist teachers in providing feedback to students is the focus of the current research. Specifically, the research investigated how similar or different AI-generated feedback was from teacher feedback, and whether there were differences in students' responses to the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition)
Hongzhi Yang; Chuan Gao; Hui-zhong Shen – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-programmed automated writing evaluation (AWE) has attracted increasing attention in language research. Using a small data set arising from an analysis of five Chinese university-level English as a foreign language (EFL) students' submissions, this paper examined in detail how EFL students interacted with the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Writing Evaluation, Computer Mediated Communication
Denise N. Morgan; Jessica L. Hrubik – Literacy Research and Instruction, 2025
Revision is a complex cognitive task and an integral component of the writing process. Students benefit from understanding the value of and how to revise their own writing. The purpose of this study was to turn to students to investigate their understandings of revision. We posed the following question: What are 7th graders' perceptions and…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Grade 7, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Melissa Mustika; Charles Y. C. Yeh; Hercy N. H. Cheng; Calvin C. Y. Liao; Tak-Wai Chan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background Study: The integration of mind maps as a prewriting activity has shown potential in enhancing students' writing skills, yet there is limited research focusing specifically on third-grade elementary students' descriptive narrative creative writing within technology-enhanced learning environments. The use of digital tools, such as writing…
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Prewriting, Writing (Composition), Narration
Dinuka B. Herath; Egena Ode; Gayanga B. Herath – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study provides a comparative assessment of the capabilities of leading artificial intelligence (AI) tools and human participants in a business management education context. Specifically, we (a) assess how well current language models perform in providing answers to standardised essay-type assessments in a business and management education…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Man Machine Systems, Educational Benefits
Hsieh, Yi-Chin; Hill, Christopher – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
In this study, a micro-level approach was used to investigate how college students in an academic writing course interact with peer and instructor feedback at "different stages" of the writing process. Participants were 146 first-year students at a Singaporean university. A survey and focus group interviews concerning students'…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Richards, K. Andrew R.; Hemphill, Michael A.; Flory, Sara B. – Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2022
While there are benefits to collaborative research, navigating group dynamics can also bring challenges, particularly for doctoral students and early career academics who are new to the research process. These dynamics extend beyond initial manuscript submission and include processes associated with interpreting reviewer comments, deciding upon…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Student Research, Group Dynamics, Publications

Peer reviewed
Direct link
