Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 26 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 119 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 276 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 410 |
Descriptor
| Feedback (Response) | 416 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 416 |
| Foreign Countries | 205 |
| Writing Instruction | 182 |
| English (Second Language) | 175 |
| Second Language Learning | 165 |
| Teaching Methods | 129 |
| Second Language Instruction | 126 |
| Student Attitudes | 121 |
| Writing Evaluation | 121 |
| Peer Evaluation | 120 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 6 |
| Schunn, Christian D. | 6 |
| Roscoe, Rod D. | 5 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 5 |
| Allen, Laura K. | 4 |
| Lee, Hee-Sun | 4 |
| Noroozi, Omid | 4 |
| Pallant, Amy | 4 |
| Yang, Yu-Fen | 4 |
| Dang, Trang Thi Doan | 3 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 9 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| China | 38 |
| Iran | 16 |
| Australia | 12 |
| Vietnam | 12 |
| Hong Kong | 10 |
| Taiwan | 10 |
| Canada | 9 |
| Indonesia | 8 |
| Japan | 8 |
| Saudi Arabia | 8 |
| Netherlands | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Marilisa Birello; Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé; Tania Salguero; Natxo Sorolla – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
This study explores the written corrective feedback provided by two university teachers in the academic texts written by their students. Specifically, it focuses on the relationship established between the linguistic and discursive errors identified by the teachers, the forms of feedback provided (direct, indirect, metalinguistic and…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Patterns, College Students
Han Zhang; Jamie Costley; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Depending on the nature of comments made during peer review of academic writing, students may be able to evaluate and revise their performance. Therefore, it is essential to explore how the content of comments affects student writing. Since peer review is a process of interaction, it is critical to understand how comments affect student academic…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Content Area Writing, Academic Language, Feedback (Response)
Simin Xu; Yanfang Su; Kanglong Liu – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Despite the well-established importance of feedback in education, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated feedback, particularly from language models like ChatGPT, remains understudied in translation education. This study investigates the engagement of Master's students in translation with ChatGPT-generated feedback during their…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Artificial Intelligence, Translation, Revision (Written Composition)
Ziqian Wei; Shuting Yin; Roy B. Clariana; Xuqian Chen – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2025
Theories and practices to enhance multiple document comprehension and integration are crucial in both personal and work contexts, especially with the proliferation of printed and online sources. This experimental investigation replicates and extends (Wei et al., Educational Technology Research and Development 72:661-685, 2024) to examine how…
Descriptors: Prereading Experience, Expository Writing, Descriptive Writing, Prompting
Xiaomei Wang – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) provides an instant and cost-effective alternative to human feedback in assessing student writing, and therefore is widely used as a pedagogical supportive tool in writing instruction. However, studies on how students perceive the usage of AWE as a surrogate writing tutor in out-of-class autonomous learning are…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Undergraduate Students
Adrian J. Rivera – Journal of Response to Writing, 2025
Continuous revision policies provide sizable benefits to students, though one previously unexplored avenue of research is how such policies can help students develop a growth mindset. For the purposes of this article, a "continuous revision policy" is one in which students can revise their work on a rolling basis up until a predetermined…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Writing Skills, Basic Writing, Writing Instruction
Lifang Bai; Yijia Wei – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Ying Zhan – Teaching in Higher Education, 2024
Few studies have explored the difficulties that undergraduates encounter in peer assessment from the dual perspectives of feedback givers and receivers and framed them in terms of specific needs for student feedback literacy development. To address this research gap, this study explored the obstacles that Hong Kong university students experienced…
Descriptors: Barriers, Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes
Amy C. Crosson; Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Margaret G. McKeown – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
We examined the effects of a text-based argument writing intervention, "Triple Q," on argument writing skills in a cluster-randomized trial where groups of middle schools were assigned to conditions within school-level SES blocks. The intervention comprised three 15-day units. Students read and discussed argument texts representing…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Grade 6, Grade 7, Persuasive Discourse
Elena Ruiz-Cortés – Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 2024
Legal translators are routinely faced with defective source texts in their professional practice while being expected to produce effective translations despite such quality issues. Given the high-quality expectations required in legal translation, we have brought this professional reality into the classroom by outlining a quality control activity…
Descriptors: Laws, Translation, Languages for Special Purposes, Quality Control
Kamila Misiejuk; Jarle Bastesen; Tatiana Ershova – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
In this study, we explore the effects of self-reported or suspected generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in essay writing on peer assessment and revision patterns among a group of early student adopters. The data were collected from a higher education course, where students engaged in a group peer assessment activity, and analysed using…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Essays, Writing (Composition), Peer Evaluation
Charalampous, Angelos; Darra, Maria – World Journal of Education, 2023
Feedback is an essential aspect of the teaching and learning process since it can objectively describe the learner's performance and guide him through revising their work to improve their academic performance. Studies regarding its application in education have recorded significant pedagogical benefits at the teaching and learning levels. The…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction, Writing Improvement
Aranzazu Bea Reyes; Carmen Rodríguez-Gonzalo – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
The importance of revision has been recognised by numerous scholars of the teaching and learning of writing (Abad & Rodríguez-Gonzalo, 2023; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1987; Camps, 2020; Horning & Becker, 2006), especially if it is understood as a recursive and transversal phase that affects all levels of language (Álvarez Angulo, 2011;…
Descriptors: College Students, Collaborative Writing, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction
Kai Guo; Emily Di Zhang; Danling Li; Shulin Yu – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
As a vital learning activity in second language (L2) writing classrooms, peer feedback plays a crucial role in improving students' writing skills. However, student reviewers face challenges in providing impactful feedback on peers' essays. Low-quality peer reviews emerge as a persistent problem, adversely affecting the learning effect of peer…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Christopher Mah; Mei Tan; Lena Phalen; Alexa Sparks; Dorottya Demszky – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2025
Effective writing feedback is a powerful tool for enhancing student learning, encouraging revision, and increasing motivation and agency. Yet, teachers face many challenges that prevent them from consistently providing effective writing feedback. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have led educators and researchers to…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing, Writing Evaluation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
