Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 33 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 89 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 146 |
Descriptor
| Essays | 171 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 171 |
| Writing Instruction | 82 |
| Feedback (Response) | 77 |
| English (Second Language) | 65 |
| Second Language Learning | 64 |
| Writing Evaluation | 61 |
| Foreign Countries | 60 |
| Second Language Instruction | 51 |
| Teaching Methods | 47 |
| Student Attitudes | 40 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 6 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 5 |
| Noroozi, Omid | 4 |
| Roscoe, Rod D. | 4 |
| Allen, Laura K. | 3 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 3 |
| Laura K. Allen | 3 |
| Litman, Diane | 3 |
| Rod D. Roscoe | 3 |
| Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem | 2 |
| Beard, Gaysha | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 82 |
| Postsecondary Education | 72 |
| Secondary Education | 27 |
| Elementary Education | 17 |
| High Schools | 15 |
| Middle Schools | 12 |
| Junior High Schools | 7 |
| Grade 6 | 6 |
| Intermediate Grades | 6 |
| Grade 5 | 4 |
| Grade 8 | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Teachers | 8 |
| Practitioners | 6 |
Location
| China | 10 |
| Canada | 5 |
| Indonesia | 4 |
| Netherlands | 4 |
| South Korea | 4 |
| Taiwan | 4 |
| Hong Kong | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| California | 2 |
| Iran | 2 |
| Japan | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 3 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 3 |
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
| General Educational… | 1 |
| Strategy Inventory for… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Kamila Misiejuk; Jarle Bastesen; Tatiana Ershova – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
In this study, we explore the effects of self-reported or suspected generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in essay writing on peer assessment and revision patterns among a group of early student adopters. The data were collected from a higher education course, where students engaged in a group peer assessment activity, and analysed using…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Essays, Writing (Composition), Peer Evaluation
Kai Guo; Emily Di Zhang; Danling Li; Shulin Yu – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
As a vital learning activity in second language (L2) writing classrooms, peer feedback plays a crucial role in improving students' writing skills. However, student reviewers face challenges in providing impactful feedback on peers' essays. Low-quality peer reviews emerge as a persistent problem, adversely affecting the learning effect of peer…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Guy J. Krueger – Thresholds in Education, 2025
Generative AI has become a quotidian discussion topic in many writing departments, and the conversations often focus on the negative aspects or the disruptions it has caused. A growing number of teachers and scholars, though, have embraced the new technology and welcomed it into their classrooms. In the Spring 2024 semester, students in my…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration
Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.; Eßer, Felix J.; Park, Mi Jin; Winstone, Naomi – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2023
Although feedback is one of the most important instructional techniques, strong empirical research on receiving feedback is scarce in comparison to research on feedback provision. In this experimental study, we examined the influence of detailed comments and praise on student motivation and change in performance. 147 university students wrote an…
Descriptors: Positive Reinforcement, Bias, Feedback (Response), Student Motivation
Xinming Chen; Ziqian Zhou; Malila Prado – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2025
This study explores the efficacy of ChatGPT-3.5, an AI chatbot, used as an Automatic Essay Scoring (AES) system and feedback provider for IELTS essay preparation. It investigates the alignment between scores given by ChatGPT-3.5 and those assigned by official IELTS examiners to establish its reliability as an AES. It also identifies the strategies…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education, Automation
Dinuka B. Herath; Egena Ode; Gayanga B. Herath – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study provides a comparative assessment of the capabilities of leading artificial intelligence (AI) tools and human participants in a business management education context. Specifically, we (a) assess how well current language models perform in providing answers to standardised essay-type assessments in a business and management education…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Man Machine Systems, Educational Benefits
Noroozi, Omid – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023
Students' argumentation performance can be influenced by their epistemic beliefs, however, in the context of argumentative essay writing and argumentative peer feedback in online setting this has not been clearly investigated. This study explores relationship between students' epistemic beliefs and argumentation performance regarding essay writing…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Student Attitudes, Persuasive Discourse, Essays
Grant Eckstein; Ying Suet Michelle Lung; Natasha Gillette – TESL-EJ, 2025
Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language…
Descriptors: Proofreading, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Ranjbaran, Fatemeh; Babaee, Maryam; Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, Marzieh; Gohari, Mehrnaz; Daneshvar Ghorbani, Babak; Taghizadeh Kerman, Nafiseh; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem; Noroozi, Omid – International Journal of Technology in Education, 2023
Performing complex tasks such as writing an argumentative essay and providing high-quality argumentative peer feedback are challenging for higher education students. This study aims to explore whether and how students' argumentation performance during peer feedback activities and essay writing is related to their culture and gender. In this…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Online Courses, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Yishen Song; Qianta Zhu; Huaibo Wang; Qinhua Zheng – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
Manually scoring and revising student essays has long been a time-consuming task for educators. With the rise of natural language processing techniques, automated essay scoring (AES) and automated essay revising (AER) have emerged to alleviate this burden. However, current AES and AER models require large amounts of training data and lack…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software
Yu Tian; Minkyung Kim; Scott Crossley; Qian Wan – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
Investigating links between temporal features of the writing process (e.g., bursts and pauses during writing) and the linguistic features found in written products would help us better understand intersections between the writing process and product. However, research on this topic is rare. This article illustrates a method to examine associations…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Connected Discourse, Writing Processes
Latifi, Saeed; Noroozi, Omid; Talaee, Ebrahim – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2021
This study compared the effects of support for peer feedback, peer feedforward and their combination on students' peer learning processes, argumentative essay quality and domain-specific learning. Participants were 86 BSc students who were randomly divided over 43 dyads. These dyads, in a two-factorial experimental design, were assigned to four…
Descriptors: Peer Relationship, Feedback (Response), Persuasive Discourse, Essays
Albert W. Li – Written Communication, 2025
High school students for whom English is a second language (L2) often struggle with effective text revision because of limited ability to self-regulate their writing, that is, to manage the subprocesses of writing and to use writing-related knowledge and strategies. To help students in China acquire effective text revision skills for English…
Descriptors: Self Management, Learning Strategies, Peer Relationship, High School Students
Suzanne Woods-Groves; Margaret M. Flores; Betty Patten; Kinga Balint-Langel; Charles A. Hughes; Taehoon Choi – Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 2024
The authors of this study examined a virtually delivered multimedia expository writing strategy via a single case multiple-baseline across participants design with three college students enrolled in a postsecondary program for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Participants responded to expository essay prompts at the…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Multimedia Materials, Essays, Writing (Composition)
Nafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman; Seyyed Kazem Banihashem; Omid Noroozi – International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2023
The aim of this study was to explore how students perceive their learning outcomes and satisfaction during an online peer feedback activity in the context of argumentative essays. In this study, 135 undergraduate Argumentative Essay Writing course on the Brightspace platform. In this module, students wrote an argumentative essay for the first…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Student Attitudes, Student Satisfaction, Feedback (Response)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
