NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 98 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clegg, Roger; Rosenberg, John S. – Academic Questions, 2012
The Supreme Court has granted review for the 2012 term in the case "Fisher v. University of Texas." Abigail Fisher, a rejected white applicant to the University of Texas, has challenged the use of racial and ethnic admission preferences, which the Court had allowed in its 2003 decision involving the University of Michigan law school,…
Descriptors: Evidence, Affirmative Action, Educational Benefits, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ellis, John M. – Academic Questions, 2008
"The first law of unintended consequences is that you can never know what they will be or how far they will reach." Professor Ellis examines the injuries American higher education has sustained through the unintended consequences of diversity. (Contains 4 footnotes.)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Affirmative Action, Excellence in Education, Educational Policy
Bell, Derrick – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
After generating months of anxiety among both proponents and opponents of public-school integration, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a predictably close 5-4 decision, ruled that the use of race in student-assignment policies by the Seattle and Louisville, Kentucky, school districts violated the rights of the white petitioners whose children were denied…
Descriptors: Race, School Effectiveness, Court Litigation, Political Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bickel, Robert D. – Education and the Law, 2008
This article suggests that any approach to the issue of access to higher education in the United Kingdom not view the approach of the United States in the recent University of Michigan cases as providing appropriate guidance. It is the author's assertion that the United States Supreme Court has failed to recognize the present effects of a long…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Racial Segregation, Foreign Countries, Desegregation Litigation
Abraham, Henry J. – University of Richmond Law Review, 1980
Outlines what reverse discrimination is and is not, and argues that the constitution is color-blind. Available from University of Richmond Law Review, School of Law, University of Richmond, VA 23173. (IRT)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Equal Protection, Quotas
Brown, Frank – 1979
This paper presents an indepth analysis of Craig v. Alabama State University (ASU), a lawsuit involving charges of reverse discrimination in employment against a historical black college. The plaintiff, who felt that the nonrenewal of his contract was due to his race, won his suit against ASU for himself and all other whites similarly situated.…
Descriptors: Black Colleges, Court Litigation, Higher Education, Reverse Discrimination
Hook, Sidney – New Perspectives, 1985
Wisdom suggests that instead of correcting the injustices of yesterday by creating the new injustices of today, it is better to recognize a statute of limitations on accountability for our inhumanity to ourselves in the distant past. (Author)
Descriptors: Accountability, Affirmative Action, Justice, Racial Discrimination
Ruzicho, Andrew J. – Personnel Administrator, 1980
Uses a question-and-answer format to amplify the "Weber" decision and explain how the case affects an employer. Is particularly concerned with the role of quotas in affirmative action plans. (IRT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Quotas
Hatch, Orrin G. – Personnel Administrator, 1980
Senator Orrin Hatch argues that affirmative action is illegal, immoral, and won't work. (IRT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Constitutional Law, Costs, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Morris, Arval A. – 1979
This paper discusses the Supreme Court's treatment of the issues in Bakke v. Regents of University of California and its implications for admissions programs. Bakke raised two basic issues in his reverse discrimination suit. First, he argued that Davis's medical school admission program was illegal under Title VI. Second, he claimed…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Equal Protection, Higher Education, Medical Schools
Ruffini, Gene – Perspectives: The Civil Rights Quarterly, 1983
Argues that Euroethnics can move out of the blue-collar class through education, struggle, and perseverance, although the higher on the executive-managerial ladder they climb, the more resistance, including reverse discrimination, they will meet. (CMG)
Descriptors: Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Ethnic Discrimination, Ethnic Groups, Reverse Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jones, James E. – International Labour Review, 1981
Discusses the history of reverse discrimination in employment and how it affects judicial treatment of affirmative action programs in the United States. (CT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Civil Rights Legislation, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Clegg, Roger – National Forum, 1999
The real question behind affirmative action in higher education is whether the form of racial discrimination it represents is worth the improved access it provides. Three arguments favoring affirmative action in this context are that affirmative action (1) is needed to keep college admissions officers from discriminating against minorities; (2)…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Admission, Diversity (Student), Higher Education
Reynolds, Wm. Bradford – 1984
"Affirmative action" is the term typically used to refer to two contrasting values: the value of equal opportunity and the value of equal results. The Justice Department under the Reagan Administration, however, draws a clear distinction between the two, and is committed to the "original" meaning of affirmative action. That is,…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Public Policy
McFeeley, Neil D. – Personnel, 1980
The "Weber" decision held that a private employer's voluntary affirmative action plan designed to remedy past racial imbalances in traditionally segregated jobs does not violate the will of Congress as expressed in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Author)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Equal Protection
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7