Descriptor
| Classification | 5 |
| Interaction Process Analysis | 5 |
| Research Projects | 5 |
| Group Dynamics | 3 |
| Measurement Instruments | 3 |
| Sensitivity Training | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Therapy | 2 |
| Behavior Change | 1 |
| Cluster Analysis | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 4 |
Author
| Miller, Brent C. | 1 |
| O'Day, Rory | 1 |
| Olson, David H. | 1 |
| Silbergeld, Sam | 1 |
| Sisson, C. J. | 1 |
| Uhlemann, Max R. | 1 |
| Weigel, Richard G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
PDF pending restorationMiller, Brent C.; Olson, David H. – 1976
The present study focuses on multiple dimensions of face-to-face marriage interaction as the basis for identifying patterns or "types" of couple relating. The research assumes that it is possible to classify marriage relationships by criteria which are objective enough to allow replication and concensus. Particular emphasis is placed on the…
Descriptors: Classification, Cluster Analysis, Data Analysis, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedO'Day, Rory – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This report focuses on differences in training style among four trainers as measured by the Training Style Scoring System. The study concludes that supportive and trusting interrelations between members develop when the leader permits open expression of hostility toward his/herself. The difficulty of allowing this is noted. (NG)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Experience, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedUhlemann, Max R.; Weigel, Richard G. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study evaluated behavior change occurring after a marathon group experience, with a focus on individualized rather than shared behavioral change criteria. The individualization of behavior change criteria is based on the assertion that few, if any, single change criteria are appropriate or realistic for assessing change in all individuals.…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Classification, College Students, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedSilbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedSisson, C. J.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the descriptions of group process obtained from the Hill Interaction Matrix (Form G) and the Bonney Scale in rating an extended counseling group of psychiatric residents (N = 10). (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Graduate Students


