Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Hypothesis Testing | 6 |
| Learning Disabilities | 6 |
| Research Methodology | 6 |
| Visual Perception | 3 |
| Etiology | 2 |
| Exceptional Child Research | 2 |
| Learning Theories | 2 |
| Opinions | 2 |
| Statistical Significance | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cundari, Leigh A. | 1 |
| Emenheiser, David E. | 1 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 1 |
| Gross, Karen | 1 |
| Leech, Nancy L. | 1 |
| Levin, Joel R. | 1 |
| Lutz, Gary J. | 1 |
| Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. | 1 |
| Rothenberg, Stephen | 1 |
| Satz, Paul | 1 |
| Vellutino, Frank R. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emenheiser, David E. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Previous literature suggests that academic achievement and self-concept among adolescents in the general education population are positively related (e.g., Huang, 2011). For students with disabilities, however, the correlation between academic achievement and self-concept is sometimes negative and non-significant (Daniel & King, 1995; Feiwell,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Self Concept, Adolescents, Disabilities
Peer reviewedLutz, Gary J.; Cundari, Leigh A. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1987
Discusses difficulties encountered in use of the Scheffe procedure to locate the most significant parametric function within a linear statistical model that has been tested and rejected by, for example, analysis of variance. A solution to the problems is presented. (TJH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Learning Disabilities, Reading Comprehension
The Validity of Perceptual Deficit Explanations of Reading Disability: A Reply to Fletcher and Satz.
Peer reviewedVellutino, Frank R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
In the article the author refutes J. Fletcher and P. Satz's analysis of the etiology of reading disability on logical, theoretical, and empirical grounds. (Author/PHR)
Descriptors: Etiology, Exceptional Child Research, Hypothesis Testing, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedFletcher, Jack M.; Satz, Paul – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
In the rejoinder the authors describe the methodological and interpretive factors in the Vellutino et al, experiments which limited the degree to which the studies refuted perceptual deficit hypotheses of reading disability. Note: for more of the interchange see EC 114 687-688. (Author/PHR)
Descriptors: Etiology, Exceptional Child Research, Hypothesis Testing, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedGross, Karen; Rothenberg, Stephen – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
Two methodological problems often arising in dyslexia research are considered. The first problem concerns the validity of experimental measures and the related problem of interpreting null results. The second problem involves the effects of sampling from a disabled population if the disorder under investigation has multiple unknown origins.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Dyslexia, Hypothesis Testing, Learning Disabilities
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Levin, Joel R.; Leech, Nancy L. – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2003
Because of criticisms leveled at statistical hypothesis testing, some researchers have argued that measures of effect size should replace the significance-testing practice. We contend that although effect-size measures have logical appeal, they are also associated with a number of limitations that may result in problematic interpretations of them…
Descriptors: Intervals, Psychological Studies, Learning Disabilities, Testing

Direct link
