Descriptor
| Computer Programs | 12 |
| Research Methodology | 12 |
| Statistical Significance | 12 |
| Statistical Analysis | 10 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 9 |
| Mathematical Models | 7 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 3 |
| Analysis of Variance | 2 |
| Data Processing | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Borich, Gary D. | 2 |
| Halperin, Silas | 2 |
| Lord, Frederic M. | 2 |
| BIDDLE, BRUCE J. | 1 |
| Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
| Carlson, James E. | 1 |
| Forster, Fred | 1 |
| Godbout Robert C. | 1 |
| Lissitz, Robert W. | 1 |
| Magidson, Jay | 1 |
| Roberge, James J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Missouri | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textHalperin, Silas – 1976
There are good reasons for the growing popularity of Monte Carlo procedures; but with increasing use comes increasing misuse. A variety of exact and approximate alternatives should be considered before one chooses to approach a problem with Monte Carlo methods. Once it has been decided that simulation is desirable, consideration should be given to…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedBorich, Gary D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Interaction Process Analysis, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewedBorich, Gary D.; Godbout Robert C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Threedifferent statistical procedures for identifying aptitude-treatment interactions are discussed: (1) treatment x blocks analysis of variance (2) homogeneity of groups regressions and (3) extreme groups analysis. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedLissitz, Robert W.; Halperin, Silas – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models
Lord, Frederic M. – 1973
Faced with a nonstandard, complicated practical problem in statistical inference, the applied statistician sometimes must use asymptotic approximations in order to compute standard errors and confidence intervals and to test hypotheses. This usually requires that he derive formulas for one or more asymptotic sampling variances (and covariances)…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Processing, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedRoberge, James J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Nonparametric Statistics
Timm, Neil H.; Carlson, James E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 1975
Simplicity and flexibility of the full rank linear model motivated this paper which introduces researchers to the theory necessary to understand the model and apply the theory in the analysis of some standard fixed effects experimental designs. The theory and examples should help researchers use the model as an experimental tool and a model for…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Programs, Geometry, Hypothesis Testing
Lord, Frederic M.; Stocking, Martha – 1972
A general Computer program is described that will compute asymptotic standard errors and carry out significance tests for an endless variety of (standard and) nonstandard large-sample statistical problems, without requiring the statistician to derive asymptotic standard error formulas. The program assumes that the observations have a multinormal…
Descriptors: Bulletins, Computer Programs, Data Processing, Error of Measurement
Bentler, Peter M.; Woodward, J. Arthur – Evaluation Quarterly, 1978
The Head Start data analyzed by Magidson (1977) were reanalyzed using Joreskog's (1976) LISREL computer program methodology. The hypothesis that the Head Start program produced zero effects on the cognitive abilities of its participants was evaluated by several Chi Square tests. In all cases, the null hypothesis could not be rejected. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Computer Programs, Evaluation Methods, Mathematical Models
Magidson, Jay – Evaluation Quarterly, 1978
In a reply to the previous article (TM 503 435), Magidson disparages the arbitrary application of the .05 significance level to these data, responds to several assertions, and provides additional data in support of his original article showing positive effects for Project Head Start. (CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Computer Programs, Evaluation Methods, Mathematical Models
Forster, Fred – 1971
Statistical methods are described for diagnosing and treating three important problems in covariate tests of significance: curvilinearity, covariable effectiveness, and treatment-covariable interaction. Six major assumptions, prerequisites for covariate procedure, are discussed in detail: (1) normal distribution, (2) homogeneity of variances, (3)…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Classification, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing
BIDDLE, BRUCE J.; SIMPSON, ANN M. – 1961
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS WERE REPORTED FOR USE IN PROCESSING DATA ON TEACHER ROLES. INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL DATA-PROCESSING METHOD WERE--(1) A PROGRAM FOR TABULATING CONTINGENCY TABLES FROM DATA ON PUNCHED CARDS, (2) A PROGRAM FOR SELECTING AND COMBINING ROWS AND CALCULATING MANN-WHITNEY MEASURES OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Computers, Educational Research, Methods Research
