NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Intelligence Scale…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 64 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shine, Lester C., II – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Two statistics for use in the Shine-Bower single-subject analysis of variance designs are compared. Advantages and precautions concerning an alternate statistic to the mean square successive difference test for testing the slow change assumptions of the Shine-Bower error term are presented. (JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Kwon, Myoungsook – 1996
This paper briefly describes unplanned and planned methods of evaluating differences between means and explains orthogonal versus nonorthogonal contrasts to help the researcher understand a framework of planned comparisons. A small heuristic data set is generated to illustrate the superiority of planned comparisons over omnibus analysis of…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J.; Toothaker, Larry E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bird, Kevin D. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Generalizations of the Scheffe, Tukey, and Bonferroni-t techniques are presented, each of which controls the experimentwise error rate for a particular type of partially or fully planned analysis. All three procedures provide more power than multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) tests. (Author/BJG)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error Patterns, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Newman, Isadore; Oravecz, Michael T. – 1977
The major concern for any research model, whether disproportionate or not, is the research question and how well that question is reflected by the model. Three "exact solutions" for disproportional situations, the hierarchial, unadjusted main effects, and fitting constant methods, are discussed in terms of the research question that each…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shine, Lester C. – Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Games, Paul A. – American Educational Research Journal, 1971
See EJ 041 277 for original article. (DG)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Games, Paul A. – American Educational Research Journal, 1971
Twelve multiple comparison tests, both simultaneous and sequential, are described, analyzed, and evaluated. Overall recommendations are presented in a flow-diagram. (DG)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marascuilo, Leonard A.; Dagenais, Fred – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
Social science researchers tend to analyze two dimensional frequency tables using Pearson's Chi-square test, which can be improved upon if the dependent variable represents an ordered qualitative characteristic. An improved modification by the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance on ranks is shown for a planned and post hoc analysis. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Social Science Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Algina, James – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
The use of analysis of covariance in simple repeated measures designs is considered. Conditions necessary for the analysis of covariance adjusted main effects and interactions to be meaningful are presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, John D. – Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 1979
Some of the more simplified methods for contrasts with equal sample sizes in multiple regression analysis are shown to result in erroneous calculations when applied to data sets with unequal sample sizes. An alternative method is provided. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Multiple Regression Analysis, Research Methodology
Ross, N. Phillip – 1975
The U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences has developed a wide range of statistical models to test hypotheses generated in relation to an equally wide range of measurement and evaluation situations. The randomized block (RB) design has traditionally been a preferred model for much psychological research. The RB has…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Models, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lutz, Gary J.; Cundari, Leigh A. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1987
Discusses difficulties encountered in use of the Scheffe procedure to locate the most significant parametric function within a linear statistical model that has been tested and rejected by, for example, analysis of variance. A solution to the problems is presented. (TJH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Learning Disabilities, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosenthal, Robert; Rubin, Donald B. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
This article presents a system for avoiding Type I error increases when increasing the number of contrasts computed. Based on the Bonferroni inequality, the procedure corrects for the number of contrasts tested. Although conservative, the Bonferroni system is recommended for its flexibility, simplicity, and generality. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
de Cani, John S. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
While Bonferroni procedures control the risk of Type I errors, their cost is loss of power. Ordered Bonferroni procedures conserve power for more important tests while sacrificing power for less important tests. Both costs and benefits should be considered when choosing weights for individual tests and the overall level of Type I error protection.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5