NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Manolov, Rumen; Solanas, Antonio – Psychological Methods, 2012
There is currently a considerable diversity of quantitative measures available for summarizing the results in single-case studies. Given that the interpretation of some of them is difficult due to the lack of established benchmarks, the current article proposes an approach for obtaining further numerical evidence on the importance of the results,…
Descriptors: Sampling, Probability, Statistical Significance, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maraun, Michael; Gabriel, Stephanie – Psychological Methods, 2010
In his article, "An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests," Killeen (2005) urged the discipline to abandon the practice of "p[subscript obs]"-based null hypothesis testing and to quantify the signal-to-noise characteristics of experimental outcomes with replication probabilities. He described the coefficient that he…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Inference, Probability, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Serlin, Ronald C. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The sense that replicability is an important aspect of empirical science led Killeen (2005a) to define "p[subscript rep]," the probability that a replication will result in an outcome in the same direction as that found in a current experiment. Since then, several authors have praised and criticized 'p[subscript rep]," culminating…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Effect Size, Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cumming, Geoff – Psychological Methods, 2010
This comment offers three descriptions of "p[subscript rep]" that start with a frequentist account of confidence intervals, draw on R. A. Fisher's fiducial argument, and do not make Bayesian assumptions. Links are described among "p[subscript rep]," "p" values, and the probability a confidence interval will capture…
Descriptors: Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques, Research Methodology, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zou, Guang Yong – Psychological Methods, 2007
Confidence intervals are widely accepted as a preferred way to present study results. They encompass significance tests and provide an estimate of the magnitude of the effect. However, comparisons of correlations still rely heavily on significance testing. The persistence of this practice is caused primarily by the lack of simple yet accurate…
Descriptors: Intervals, Effect Size, Research Methodology, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Blouin, David C.; Riopelle, Arthur J. – Psychological Methods, 2005
Confidence intervals (CIs) for means are frequently advocated as alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), for which a common theme in the debate is that conclusions from CIs and NHST should be mutually consistent. The authors examined a class of CIs for which the conclusions are said to be inconsistent with NHST in…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Generalization, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Scott E. – Psychological Methods, 2004
Underpowered studies persist in the psychological literature. This article examines reasons for their persistence and the effects on efforts to create a cumulative science. The "curse of multiplicities" plays a central role in the presentation. Most psychologists realize that testing multiple hypotheses in a single study affects the Type I error…
Descriptors: Psychology, Psychological Studies, Effect Size, Research Methodology