Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Interpretation | 2 |
| Performance Factors | 2 |
| Research Design | 2 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Advisory Committees | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
| Diversity (Faculty) | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkPorter, Stephen R. – Journal of Higher Education, 2007
Despite the role that institutional service plays in the tenure and promotion process, quantitative research in this area has focused on the percentage of time spent on service and administration, with little research on specific aspects of faculty service. Committee work, one of the most important parts of faculty service, has been particularly…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Advisory Committees, College Faculty, Teacher Participation
Peer reviewedAzevedo, Roger; Bernard, Robert – British Journal of Educational Technology, 1995
A meta-analysis determined the importance of feedback in computer-based learning; 59 studies were collected and evaluated for inclusion in the meta-analysis in terms of design, sample size, and availability of appropriate statistics. Achievement outcomes were found to be greater for the feedback group than the control group. (AEF)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Computer Assisted Instruction, Data Interpretation, Educational Research
