NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 61 to 75 of 186 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Troisi, Joseph R., II – Psychological Record, 2006
To date, only 1 study has evaluated the impact of a Pavlovian drug conditional stimulus (CS) on operant responding. A within-subject operant 1-lever go/no-go (across sessions) design was used to evaluate the impact of Pavlovian contingencies on the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) and ethanol (800 mg/kg) in male Sprague…
Descriptors: Training, Reinforcement, Classical Conditioning, Behavior Modification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Duuren, Esther; Nieto Escamez, Francisco A.; Joosten, Ruud N. J. M. A.; Visser, Rein; Mulder, Antonius B.; Pennartz, Cyriel M. A. – Learning & Memory, 2007
The orbitofrontal cortex (OBFc) has been suggested to code the motivational value of environmental stimuli and to use this information for the flexible guidance of goal-directed behavior. To examine whether information regarding reward prediction is quantitatively represented in the rat OBFc, neural activity was recorded during an olfactory…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Rewards, Coding, Knowledge Representation
Ginsberg, Rose – J Exp Child Psychol, 1969
Study supported by Mental Health Research Grant 605-5-373.
Descriptors: Color, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children
Keeley, Stuart M.; Sprague, Robert L. – J Exp Child Psychol, 1969
Research supported in part by Public Health Service grant NB-07346 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Feedback, Handicapped Children, Learning Motivation
HALL, VERNON C.; AND OTHERS – 1967
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF FIVE VARIABLES (INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS, REWARD, LETTER SIZE, TYPE OF WARM-UP, AND FEEDBACK) ON KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN'S PERFORMANCE OF A LETTER DISCRIMINATION TASK. IT HAS BEEN ARGUED THAT ATTENTION IS THE KEY FACTOR IN LETTER DISCRIMINATION. THE PRESENT STUDY PROPOSES THAT A…
Descriptors: Attention, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Perception
Weimer, Michael; Miller, Asenath A. – 1974
The study attempted to minimize nonspecific response strategies which supposedly mask the positive effect of perceptual pretraining on initial discrimination learning within the predifferentiation paradigm. The subjects were 44 first- and second-graders. Experimental-group subjects received rules learning (RL), pretraining, initial discrimination…
Descriptors: Cues, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Learning Theories
Shaffer, Scott C.; And Others – 1969
Upper-middle and low socio-economic level (SEL) subjects were compared on a discrimination learning task and on personality measures of locus of control of reinforcement and need for approval (Napp). Upper-middle SEL subjects were found to be faster discrimination learners than low SEL subjects only when the relevant stimulus cue was on a highly…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Lower Class, Middle Class, Personality Studies
Turnure, James E.; Larsen, Sharon N. – 1972
Investigated were the effects of varying instructional explicitness (minimal, general, and explicit) and types of reinforcement (none, extrinsic, and intrinsic or relational) on the learning of an oddity discrimination task by 48 nursery school children. Ss were randomly assigned to six groups where general or minimal instructional explicitness…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Learning, Preschool Children, Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koegel, Robert L.; Wilhelm, Hannelore – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1973
Fifteen autistic and 15 normal Ss were trained to respond to a card containing two visual cues. The children were further tested on the single cues in order to assess whether one or both stimuli had acquired control over their responding. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Autism, Child Psychology, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ratliff, Richard G. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Major finding was that punishment presented in the same sensory modality as the reinforcement was superior to punishment presented in a different sensory modality from the reinforcement. (Author)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Grade 3, Learning Modalities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldstein, Sondra Blevins; Siegel, Alexander W. – Child Development, 1971
Study found that stimulus presence during a delay of reinforcement interval enhanced performance, and to a large extent prevented the usual delay-produced decrement. (Authors)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Grade 3, Intervals
Gruber, Ronald P. – J Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: College Graduates, Color, Discrimination Learning, Generalization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ramey, Craig T.; Goulet, L. R. – Child Development, 1971
Male school children of three age levels were tested on a 2-choice visual discrimination task that varied in spatial continguity of stimulus, response, and reward. Separation of stimulus from response and reward was found to retard learning. (WY)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Grade 2, Grade 4, Grade 6
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harter, Susan; And Others – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Handicapped Children, Learning Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McFarland, Richard A. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Anxiety, Behavioral Science Research, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13