Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Recreation | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Campuses | 1 |
| Curriculum Development | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Objectives | 1 |
| Participant Satisfaction | 1 |
| Prior Learning | 1 |
| Professional Development | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Parks and Recreation | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Mississippi | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkAmanda Alpert Jessee – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Kuh and colleagues (2008) use the term "high-impact practices" (HIPs) to describe co-curricular programs that are particularly effective in advancing student learning. The original list of HIPs does not include campus employment, which McClellan et al. (2018) argued should be added. According to the results from the 2019 NASPA survey…
Descriptors: Recreation, Student Employment, School Recreational Programs, Professional Development
Sternloff, Robert E. – Parks and Recreation, 1981
The question of how close a recreation program approximates the original objective of the programer can only be answered by extensive evaluation. The true value of the total recreation program may be determined by evaluating the benefit of a recreation program to the participant. (JN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Objectives, Participant Satisfaction
