Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 3 |
| Paired Associate Learning | 3 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 3 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Charts | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Encoding (Psychology) | 1 |
| Experience | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkPeterson, Daniel J.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
One of the foundational principles of human memory is that repetition (i.e., being presented with a stimulus multiple times) improves recall. In the current study a group of participants who studied a list of cue-target pairs twice recalled fewer targets than a group who studied the pairs only once, a negative repetition effect. Such a…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Repetition, Stimuli
Peer reviewedRunquist, Willard N.; Runquist, Peggy A. – American Journal of Psychology, 1976
This experiment demonstrated that people can utilize relative situational frequency of occurrence to differentiate similary categorizable target items in paired-associate learning. (Editor)
Descriptors: Charts, Classification, Learning Processes, Paired Associate Learning
Peer reviewedHowe, Mark L.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1985
Reported an experiment on the effects of taxonomic organization on 7- and 11-year-olds' free and cued recall of two- and four-category lists. Analysis used a stages-of-learning model that simultaneously delivered estimates of the impact of these manipulations on storage and retrieval components of recall. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cues, Encoding (Psychology)
