Descriptor
| Reading Research | 37 |
| Test Validity | 37 |
| Readability | 27 |
| Readability Formulas | 19 |
| Test Reliability | 17 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 14 |
| Reading Comprehension | 12 |
| Reading Tests | 12 |
| Cloze Procedure | 10 |
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Reading Diagnosis | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Reading | 6 |
| Reading Teacher | 4 |
| Reading Horizons | 3 |
| Journal of Reading Behavior | 2 |
| Reading Res Quart | 2 |
| Clearing House | 1 |
| J Reading | 1 |
| Reading | 1 |
| Reading Psychology | 1 |
| Reading Research Quarterly | 1 |
| Reading World | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Austria | 1 |
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McLaughlin, G. Harry – J Reading, 1969
Descriptors: Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Materials, Reading Research
Peer reviewedBaldwin, R. Scott; Kaufman, Rhonda K. – Journal of Reading, 1979
Attempts to determine whether the Raygor graph produces readability estimates compatible with estimates derived from the Fry graph, whether the Raygor graph is less time-consuming, and whether it lends itself to greater computational accuracy. (DD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedDuffelmeyer, Frederick A. – Reading Teacher, 1982
Reveals that the Rauding Scale of Prose Difficulty provides results closer to Spache and Dale-Chall values than does the Singer Eyeball Estimate of Readability (SEER) technique. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Elementary Education, Readability
Peer reviewedBradley, John M.; Ames, Wilbur S. – Journal of Reading, 1984
Describes the Luiten, Ames, Bradley Readability Variation Method for estimating the variation within a text. Concludes that it is practical and relatively accurate. (HOD)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Readability
Peer reviewedHansell, T. Stevenson – Journal of Reading, 1976
Raises doubts about the validity of readability formulas. (RB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Measurement Instruments, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedBamberger, Richard; Rabin, Annette T. – Reading Teacher, 1984
Describes recent Austrian research concerning readability formulas, especially the Swedish Lix formula. Describes a prototype for a system of evaluating the individual variables that contribute to the difficulty of student reading materials. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedTurner, Edward C.; Algozzine, Kate – Clearing House, 1985
Reports findings of a study that examined the extent to which the variability observed in reading levels of common junior high textbooks was also present in four popular high school social studies texts. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
Marr, Mary Beth – 1982
The passage comprehensibility of three diagnostic reading tests--the Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test, the Spache Diagnostic Reading Scales, and the Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty--was evaluated using the following text variables: content familiarity, vocabulary, the number of idea units in the text, the number of text-based inferences…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Davison, Alice – 1986
Defining readability in both the narrow sense of formula use and refinement and the broader sense of the processing and comprehension of language, this paper argues for the need for more research focusing on readability as a way of improving the match between reader and text. Following a brief introduction, the paper reviews current readability…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, English, Language Processing, Non English Speaking
Peer reviewedWilliamson, John – Reading, 1986
Reports on a study that examined the readability of a selection of C. S. E. papers taken from six subject areas. Found that, with the exception of that given in history, the exams did not make excessive demands on the candidates' reading skills. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Readability, Reading Research, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSinger, Harry – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1975
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Readability, Reading Level
Peer reviewedKeenan, Donna – Reading Horizons, 1982
Suggests that the popular and simple readability formulas may not be accurate enough to predict the instructional materials best suited to the reading abilities of secondary school students. (FL)
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Reading Research, Secondary Education, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedPikulski, John J.; Pikulski, Edna C. – Reading Teacher, 1977
When cloze and maze scores are compared with teacher judgment in establishing the independent, instructional, and fustration levels of students, both techniques tend to overestimate a child's ability. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Elementary Education, Grade 5, Readability
Aquino, Milagros R. – Reading Res Quart, 1969
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Memory, Rating Scales, Readability
Peer reviewedLongo, Judith A. – Journal of Reading, 1982
Validates the college-level designation of the Fry Graph using comparative validity data. (AEA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Materials


