Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Notetaking | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Textbooks | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Behavior Patterns | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Lan, Andrew | 2 |
| Mozer, Michael | 2 |
| Winchell, Adam | 2 |
| Grimaldi, Phillip | 1 |
| Pashler, Harold | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWinchell, Adam; Lan, Andrew; Mozer, Michael – Cognitive Science, 2020
When engaging with a textbook, students are inclined to highlight key content. Although students believe that highlighting and subsequent review of the highlights will further their educational goals, the psychological literature provides little evidence of benefits. Nonetheless, a student's choice of text for highlighting may serve as a window…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Reading Comprehension, Student Interests, Reader Text Relationship
Download full textWinchell, Adam; Mozer, Michael; Lan, Andrew; Grimaldi, Phillip; Pashler, Harold – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2018
When engaging with a textbook, students are inclined to highlight key content. Although students believe that highlighting and subsequent review of the highlights will further their educational goals, the psychological literature provides no evidence of benefits. Nonetheless, a student's choice of text for highlighting may serve as a window into…
Descriptors: Textbooks, Biology, Documentation, Science Instruction
