Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Reader Text Relationship | 3 |
| Text Structure | 3 |
| Writing Research | 3 |
| Audience Awareness | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Baaijen, Veerle M. | 1 |
| Black, Alison | 1 |
| De Jong, Menno | 1 |
| Galbraith, David | 1 |
| Jan Schellens, Peter | 1 |
| Watts, Darren | 1 |
| de Glopper, Kees | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Baaijen, Veerle M.; Galbraith, David; de Glopper, Kees – Written Communication, 2012
Although keystroke logging promises to provide a valuable tool for writing research, it can often be difficult to relate logs to underlying processes. This article describes the procedures and measures that the authors developed to analyze a sample of 80 keystroke logs, with a view to achieving a better alignment between keystroke-logging measures…
Descriptors: Sentences, Text Structure, Factor Analysis, Classification
Peer reviewedBlack, Alison; Watts, Darren – Visible Language, 1993
Examines the impact on proofreading accuracy of setting text in monospaced typewriter faces and proportionally spaced typefaces. Finds no significant differences. Notes that proofreading suffered when an irregularly spaced typeface was used. Suggests that text may be checked more thoroughly if its format suggests provisionality. (RS)
Descriptors: Error Correction, Higher Education, Proofreading, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewedJan Schellens, Peter; De Jong, Menno – Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1997
Describes a small-scale experiment in which five professional writers were asked to revise brochure fragments based on the feedback from readers. Discusses the type of feedback collected from readers and how the experiment focused on the revision phase following formative text evaluation. (SG)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Feedback, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education

Direct link
