Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 7 |
| Reader Response | 7 |
| Criticism | 3 |
| Evaluation Problems | 3 |
| Cognitive Ability | 2 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Misconceptions | 2 |
| Statistical Bias | 2 |
| Test Bias | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| American Psychologist | 3 |
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
| Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
| International Journal of… | 1 |
| Practical Assessment,… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 6 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Flanagan, Dawn P.; Schneider, W. Joel – International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2016
When education works, it creates productive, innovative citizens eager to contribute to a well-functioning democracy. In contrast, educational failure has lifelong consequences, with some individuals experiencing decades of preventable hardship. Dawn Flanagan and Joel Schneider write in this response that, like Kranzler, Floyd, Benson, Zabowski,…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Identification, Diagnostic Tests, Criticism
Williams, Matt N.; Gomez Grajales, Carlos Alberto; Kurkiewicz, Dason – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2013
In 2002, an article entitled "Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test" by Osborne and Waters was published in "PARE." This article has gone on to be viewed more than 275,000 times (as of August 2013), and it is one of the first results displayed in a Google search for "regression…
Descriptors: Multiple Regression Analysis, Misconceptions, Reader Response, Predictor Variables
Helms, Janet E. – American Psychologist, 2009
In defending tests of cognitive abilities, knowledge, or skills (CAKS) from the skepticism of their "family members, friends, and neighbors" and aiding psychologists forced to defend tests from "myth and hearsay" in their own skeptical social networks (p. 215), Sackett, Borneman, and Connelly focused on evaluating validity coefficients, racial or…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Cognitive Ability, Error of Measurement, Test Bias
Wicherts, Jelte M.; Millsap, Roger E. – American Psychologist, 2009
Sacked, Borne man, and Connelly recently discussed several criticisms that are often raised against the use of cognitive tests in selection. One criticism concerns the issue of measurement bias in cognitive ability tests with respect to specific groups in society. Sacked et AL. (2008) stated that "absent additional information, one cannot…
Descriptors: Prediction, Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability, Statistical Bias
Sackett, Paul R.; Borneman, Matthew J.; Connelly, Brian S. – American Psychologist, 2009
We are pleased that our article prompted this series of four commentaries and that we have this opportunity to respond. We address each in turn. Duckworth and Kaufman and Agars discussed, respectively, two broad issues concerning the validity of selection systems, namely, the expansion of the predictor domain to include noncognitive predictors of…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Reader Response, Error of Measurement, Test Bias
Richardson, John T. E. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2007
In a series of publications, the author and his colleagues have obtained scores from students in higher education on different questionnaires, and they have described the relationships among these scores using the statistic known as Wilks' [lambda]. Burt (2005) has criticized that the use of this measure is inappropriate, arguing (1) that the…
Descriptors: Criticism, Questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, Reader Response
Reckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
Schulz (2006) provides a different perspective on standard setting than that provided in Reckase (2006). He also suggests a modification to the bookmark procedure and some alternative models for errors in panelists' judgments than those provided by Reckase. This article provides a response to some of the points made by Schulz and reports some…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting, Reader Response, Regression (Statistics)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
