Descriptor
| Computation | 5 |
| Reader Response | 5 |
| Misconceptions | 4 |
| Criticism | 3 |
| Generalization | 2 |
| Artificial Speech | 1 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBonatti, Luca L.; Nespor, Marina; Pena, Marcela; Mehler, Jacques – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2006
M. Pena, L. L. Bonatti, M. Nespor, and J. Mehler (see record 2002-06215-001) argued that humans compute nonadjacent statistical relations among syllables in a continuous artificial speech stream to extract words, but they use other computations to determine the structural properties of words. Instead, when participants are familiarized with a…
Descriptors: Criticism, Syllables, Artificial Speech, Computation
Perruchet, Pierre; Peereman, Ronald; Tyler, Michael D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2006
L. L. Bonatti, M. Pena, M. Nespor, and J. Mehler (see record 2006-06642-010) argued that P. Perruchet, M. D. Tyler, N. Galland, and R. Peereman (see record 2004-21166-008) confused the notions of segmentation and generalization by ignoring the evidence for generalization in M. Pena, L. L. Bonatti, M. Nespor, and J. Mehler (see record…
Descriptors: Computation, Generalization, Experimental Psychology, Summative Evaluation
Luhmann, Christian C.; Ahn, Woo-kyoung – Psychological Review, 2005
D. Hume (1739/1987) argued that causality is not observable. P. W. Cheng claimed to present "a theoretical solution to the problem of causal induction first posed by Hume more than two and a half centuries ago" (p. 398) in the form of the power PC theory (L. R. Novick & P. W. Cheng). This theory claims that people's goal in causal induction is to…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Causal Models, Reader Response, Misconceptions
Botvinick, Matthew M.; Plaut, David C. – Psychological Review, 2006
This article responds to the reply by Cooper and Shallice to Botvinick and Plaut's previous comment . In the authors' view, the reply by Cooper and Shallice left their original responses more or less intact. The present exchange has strongly highlighted the degree to which any account of the habit system will interact with how the goal-directed…
Descriptors: Criticism, Debate, Reader Response, Sequential Approach
Kraemer, Helena Chmura – Psychological Methods, 2005
R. Rosenthal and D. B. Rubin (2003) proposed an effect size, r-sub(equivalent), to be used when (a) only sample size and p values are known for a study, (b) there are no generally accepted effect size indicators, or (c) sample sizes are so small or the data so non-normal that the directly computed effect sizes would be more misleading than the…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Sample Size, Reader Response, Criticism
