Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Elementary School Science | 5 |
| Readability | 5 |
| Readability Formulas | 5 |
| Science Education | 4 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 3 |
| Content Area Reading | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Educational Research | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Science and Mathematics | 2 |
| Canadian Journal of Education | 1 |
| Cogent Education | 1 |
| Science and Children | 1 |
Author
| Bansiong, Apler J. | 1 |
| Ciampa, Katia | 1 |
| Fazio, Xavier | 1 |
| Gallagher, Tiffany | 1 |
| Goldsmith, Robert H. | 1 |
| Sherman, Thomas F. | 1 |
| Shymansky, James A. | 1 |
| Wheeler, George | 1 |
| Yore, Larry D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Philippines | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bansiong, Apler J. – Cogent Education, 2019
Textbooks remain as major learning aids in all levels of education worldwide. Thus, textbooks must constantly be subjected to critical analysis in order to establish their curricular usefulness. This paper analyzed four commercial science textbooks designed for third grade Filipino learners. The four textbooks were analyzed according to…
Descriptors: Readability, Content Analysis, Textbook Content, Science Education
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education
Peer reviewedWheeler, George; Sherman, Thomas F. – Science and Children, 1983
Readability formulas typically yield results stated as a number or grade equivalent. However, results of one formula may not be compared to another because formulas use different criteria to measure readability. A description of eight popular formulas illustrate this point. Suggests that other factors be considered when selecting reading…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Elementary School Science, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedShymansky, James A.; Yore, Larry D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1979
Using the Fry Readability approach and a ten percent random sample of all reading materials from each grade level within a program, readability data were collected on six popular elementary science textbook series. Fry readability averages and ranges for the six programs surveyed are reported by grade level. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Educational Research, Elementary Education, Elementary School Science
Peer reviewedGoldsmith, Robert H. – School Science and Mathematics, 1980
Reports on a study which attempted to determine the reading level of 70 filmstrips with captions that form logical sequences. Results indicate that the classroom teacher might want to use readability formulae in planning the use of filmstrips. (Author/SA)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Media, Educational Research, Educational Resources

Direct link
