Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Child Development | 2 |
| Discriminant Analysis | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Caregivers | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Emergent Literacy | 1 |
| Family Characteristics | 1 |
| Family Environment | 1 |
| Family Literacy | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Preschool Language Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSkarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth; Campbell, Wenonah; Dempsey, Lynn – American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2009
Purpose: This study tested the accuracy with which the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Level III (CDI-III), a parent report measure of language ability, discriminated children with language impairment from those developing language typically. Method: Parents of 58 children, 49 with typically developing language (age 30 to 42…
Descriptors: Intervals, Language Impairments, Vocabulary, Discriminant Analysis
Kirby, John R.; Hogan, Brenda – Exceptionality Education International, 2008
A battery of reading-related and reading measures was used to select samples of good (N = 30) and poor readers (N = 19) in Grade 1. Parents of these children completed a questionnaire about current and preschool home literacy practices and socio-economic status (SES). The 2 groups were compared with t tests and in a discriminant analysis. The t…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Family Literacy, Emergent Literacy, Grade 1
