Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Audience Response | 1 |
| Campuses | 1 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Lecture Method | 1 |
| Questionnaires | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
Source
| Educational Technology… | 1 |
Author
| Bodie, Graham D. | 1 |
| Dunning, John B., Jr. | 1 |
| Elmore, David | 1 |
| Evans, Ed | 1 |
| Feng, Bo | 1 |
| Geddes, Brian | 1 |
| Homan, Scott R. | 1 |
| Khichadia, Sangeetha | 1 |
| Lichti, Steven M. | 1 |
| MacGeorge, Erina L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMacGeorge, Erina L.; Homan, Scott R.; Dunning, John B., Jr.; Elmore, David; Bodie, Graham D.; Evans, Ed; Khichadia, Sangeetha; Lichti, Steven M.; Feng, Bo; Geddes, Brian – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2008
In the past few years, audience response technology (ART) has been widely adopted on college campuses, and is especially popular among instructors of large lecture classes. Claims regarding ART's benefits to students have received only limited empirical evaluation, and prior studies exhibit methodological limitations. The current study provides a…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Campuses, Student Evaluation, Student Attitudes
