Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Program Validation | 3 |
| Psychometrics | 3 |
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Investigations | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational and Psychological… | 3 |
Author
| Donnellan, M. Brent | 1 |
| Gilpin, Andrew R. | 1 |
| Koskey, Kristin L. K. | 1 |
| Sondergeld, Toni A. | 1 |
| Stone, Gregory Ethan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Sondergeld, Toni A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Models, Construct Validity
Gilpin, Andrew R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r[subscript equivalent], for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Correlation, Meta Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Donnellan, M. Brent – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
The properties of the achievement goal inventories developed by Grant and Dweck (2003) and Elliot and McGregor (2001) were evaluated in two studies with a total of 780 participants. A four-factor specification for the Grant and Dweck inventory did not closely replicate results published in their original report. In contrast, the structure of the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Psychometrics, Program Validation, Achievement Rating

Peer reviewed
Direct link
