Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Course Selection (Students) | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Programming Languages | 2 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Career Choice | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Mexico | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Academic Motivation Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAnkora, Carlos; Bolatimi, Stephen Oladagba; Bensah, Lily; Mahama, Francois; Kuadey, Noble Arden; Adu, Adolph Sedem Yaw; Adjei, Laurene – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: The degree to which Computer Science (CS) and Information Communication Technology (ICT) students are motivated to learn greatly impacts their study habits, academic achievement in school and ultimately their job prospects. In recent times, skills in programming languages have become vital in searching for employment. Objective: This…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Motivation, Course Selection (Students), Programming Languages
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela; Arjona-Villicaña, P. David; Castillo-Barrera, F. Edgar – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2016
Learning to program is a complex task, and the impact of different pedagogical approaches to teach this skill has been hard to measure. This study examined the performance data of seven cohorts of students (N = 1168) learning programming under three different pedagogical approaches. These pedagogical approaches varied either in the length of the…
Descriptors: Programming, Teaching Methods, Intermode Differences, Cohort Analysis
