Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 29 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 177 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 460 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1461 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 8670 |
| Program Evaluation | 8670 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1738 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1429 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1371 |
| Models | 1196 |
| Higher Education | 1155 |
| Foreign Countries | 927 |
| Educational Assessment | 881 |
| Program Development | 793 |
| Research Methodology | 737 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 690 |
| Administrators | 325 |
| Researchers | 256 |
| Teachers | 174 |
| Policymakers | 147 |
| Community | 21 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Media Staff | 15 |
| Students | 13 |
| Counselors | 7 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 202 |
| California | 119 |
| Australia | 110 |
| Illinois | 99 |
| United Kingdom | 98 |
| Florida | 87 |
| United States | 74 |
| Texas | 62 |
| New York | 58 |
| Pennsylvania | 57 |
| North Carolina | 53 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedBoyle, J. David – NASSP Bulletin, 1992
Evaluation of secondary school music programs should not be based on performing groups' success. The Music Educators National Conference has suggested that a comprehensive evaluation should examine several aspects of a school music program, including goals and objectives, leadership, staffing, curriculum and scheduling, instructional materials,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Music Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedHendricks, Michael; Papagiannis, Meredith – Evaluation Practice, 1990
Steps in presenting evaluation recommendations are outlined. The steps include the following: the development of effective recommendations, the presentation of effective recommendations, and the effective following up of recommendations. (TJH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedKnox, Colin; Hughes, Joanne – Community Development Journal, 1994
Offers a case study that examines the methodological problems of evaluating a community relations program in Northern Ireland. Recommends a quantitative and qualitative approach to evaluation and raises issues that must be addressed when evaluating community development programs. (Author/JOW)
Descriptors: Community Development, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Policy
Peer reviewedMcDonald, Diane – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1999
Identifies key factors that should be considered by those engaged in the evaluation of overseas development projects to ensure that the evaluation process leads to the empowerment of local stakeholders. A literature review resulted in the development of seven guidelines for evaluation of overseas development projects. (SLD)
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Peer reviewedHennessy, Michael; Greenberg, Judith – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Describes the integration of programmatic theory and structural equation modeling to serve as the basic intellectual machinery for designing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Illustrates this integration with the example of a program to reduce sexual risk taking. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Program Evaluation, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewedRyan, Katherine E.; Johnson, Trav D. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses the results of an instrumental case study to identify issues connected to evaluation participation and its representation and the role of the internal evaluator in democratic, deliberative evaluation. Identified direct participation and participation by representation, sanctioned or unsanctioned representation, and extrinsic and intrinsic…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Incentives
Peer reviewedMacNeil, Cheryl – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses a case study of an evaluation conducted in a psychiatric institution to illustrate the issues that arise when techniques of deliberative democratic evaluation are applied in an antidemocratic climate. Illuminates strategies for stakeholder inclusion from a deliberative, democratic point of view. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Psychiatric Hospitals
Peer reviewedHood, Stafford – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Deliberative democratic evaluation and other evaluation approaches that require the linkage of evaluation to social and institutional structures require the application of democratic principles in evaluation and policy decisions that reflect these ideas. Outlines challenges in ensuring that members of diverse groups are represented in evaluations.…
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Policy Formation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Program-theory approaches to evaluation have gained acceptability over the past 25 years as a means for examining conditions for implementation that are associated with better outcomes and developing detailed program theory. They have also gained confusion, as witnessed in the review of recent studies in this article. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Program Implementation, Research Utilization
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol H. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
The "use of evaluation" once meant the use of evaluation results for making program decisions, but there is a new awareness of the possibility of using many aspects of evaluation. This paper highlights the importance of considering additional prospective users of evaluation, including organizers, client groups, and civil society. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Audience Response, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedO'Sullivan, Rita G.; O'Sullivan, John M. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1998
The Evaluation Voices approach collaboratively united perspectives of program stakeholders, evaluators, and network partners to strengthen individual program evaluation strategies. This approach is described, with emphasis on the shared experience of evaluators and network partners. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Experience
Peer reviewedScheirer, Mary Ann – American Journal of Evaluation, 2000
Suggests that performance measurement data already being collected could become more useful, at low additional cost, by further analyzing the relationships among the measures, especially across time. Using logic models and analyzing variability among program delivery units could provide evidence for hypothesized connections among delivery,…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Performance Based Assessment, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedBrett, Belle; Hill-Mead, Lynnae; Wu, Stephanie – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Examined the stages of evaluation practice and use at a national multisite community service program with an internal evaluation department. Reviews challenges to evaluation use and organizational supports for it and discusses the integrated theory of use of K. Kirkhart (2000) at both site and national levels. Summarizes lessons learned in this…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, National Programs, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedRogers, Patricia J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Discusses the role that causal models play in program theory evaluation. Considers several types of causal relationships and discusses three causal models derived from systems theory, the theories of virtuous or vicious cycles, symptomatic solutions, and feedback delays. (SLD)
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedHeubner, Tracy A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Explores how theory-based evaluation can be used to help conduct formative, reflective evaluation in educational settings. Program theory evaluation identifies links between planned activities and anticipated outcomes. This model helps schools clarify program goals, and builds cooperation and buy-in an evaluation as it encourages reflective…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Outcomes of Education, Program Evaluation


