NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 76 to 90 of 349 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Discusses ethical challenges faced by evaluators, especially those who have gotten into problems while conducting the evaluation. Introduces the other articles in this theme section. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cummings, Oliver W. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1992
Notes that, very early in program planning, budgets are estimated for major program components, including evaluation. Proposes heuristic for establishing reasonable evaluation estimates in initial planning. Describes logical sources of information from which to construct such a heuristic. Recommends that, for typical programs and projects, initial…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Reflects on an evaluation that aspired to be inclusive but generally failed to provide a backdrop for a discussion of inclusive evaluation. Identifies issues of absence of significant stakeholders, making of values by method, and the limited authority of the evaluation. Shows how easily deliberative intentions are distorted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stake, Robert E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Challenges the assumption that evaluation should aim for fostering deliberative democracy. A modest effort by an evaluator to contribute to deliberative democracy is defensible, but vigorous political advocacy violates social expectation. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
Xu, Zeyu; Nichols, Austin – National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 2010
The gold standard in making causal inference on program effects is a randomized trial. Most randomization designs in education randomize classrooms or schools rather than individual students. Such "clustered randomization" designs have one principal drawback: They tend to have limited statistical power or precision. This study aims to…
Descriptors: Test Format, Reading Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Neault, Roberta A.; Pickerell, Deirdre A. – Journal of Employment Counseling, 2008
Career development practitioners understand that the value of career and employment services extends beyond attachment to the labor market. However, "soft" outcomes such as increased self-efficacy and improved ability to manage transitions are difficult to measure. Convincing funders and policy makers of the significance of such outcomes…
Descriptors: Employment Services, Summative Evaluation, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McEwan, Patrick J. – Comparative Education, 2008
This paper describes three multigrade school reforms in Latin America: (1) Colombia's "Escuela Nueva", (2) Guatemala's "Nueva Escuela Unitaria", and (3) Chile's MECE-Rural. Each reform endowed primary teachers and students with special training and instructional materials, and encouraged new kinds of instruction in rural…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Foreign Countries, Comparative Education, Educational Assessment
Wall, Terry Cobb – 1984
Values and beliefs underlying assumptions concerning the independent evaluations of persons and programs involved in the educational process are discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on M. Scriven's treatise on bias in evaluation (1976). Works by E. R. House, R. E. Stake, L. Stenhouse, M. Parlett and D. Hamilton, and D. L. Stufflebeam are also…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Outlines a scenario in which an evaluator wants to ask questions of teenagers that may pose ethical problems, or may be perceived as posing such problems. The hypothetical situation is the evaluation of a life skills program aimed at reducing the teen birth rate. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
Emihovich, Catherine; Blake, Brenedette Hardy – 1992
Taking the position that science is not value-free has certain consequences. There are both risks and rewards inherent when evaluators relinquish an objective, non-involved role for a more subjective, partisan role in an evaluation where issues of class, gender, and race are intertwined. It is important for evaluators to consider how their…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leviton, Laura C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Suggests a strategy for dealing with the situation in which evaluators wish to ask teenage participants in a life skills program questions that might be seen as controversial. The strategy relies on an inclusive planning committee, a low-key poll to provide background information, and a foot in the door opening to start the process. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Community, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McClintock, Charles – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Suggests that the key issue in the evaluation problem scenario is not so much an ethical problem as it is a strategic problem. The evaluator needs to be educator, change agent, and organizational development practitioner to make this evaluation a success. (SLD)
Descriptors: Change, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGaghie, William C.; Thompson, Jason A. – Academic Medicine, 2001
Describes and critiques medical school rankings by "U.S. News & World Report" on methodologic and conceptual grounds, arguing that the annual evaluation falls short in both areas. Presents three alternative categories of program quality indicators. Concludes that the rankings have no practical value and fail to meet standards of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Research, Higher Education, Medical Schools
Belfield, Clive – Education and the Public Interest Center, 2009
A report from the School Choice Demonstration Project examines issues concerning the funding formula used for the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP). It finds that the program generates a net saving to taxpayers in Wisconsin but imposes a significant fiscal burden on taxpayers in Milwaukee. However, these findings depend significantly on how…
Descriptors: Funding Formulas, School Choice, Demonstration Programs, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hagermoser Sanetti, Lisa M.; Kratochwill, Thomas R. – School Psychology Review, 2009
Treatment integrity (also referred to as "treatment fidelity," "intervention integrity," and "procedural reliability") is an important methodological concerning both research and practice because treatment integrity data are essential to making valid conclusions regarding treatment outcomes. Despite its relationship to validity, treatment…
Descriptors: Intervention, Research Methodology, Models, Validity
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  24