Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 30 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 178 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 461 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1462 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 8671 |
| Program Evaluation | 8671 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1739 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1429 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1371 |
| Models | 1196 |
| Higher Education | 1155 |
| Foreign Countries | 927 |
| Educational Assessment | 881 |
| Program Development | 793 |
| Research Methodology | 737 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 690 |
| Administrators | 325 |
| Researchers | 256 |
| Teachers | 174 |
| Policymakers | 147 |
| Community | 21 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Media Staff | 15 |
| Students | 13 |
| Counselors | 7 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 202 |
| California | 119 |
| Australia | 110 |
| Illinois | 99 |
| United Kingdom | 98 |
| Florida | 87 |
| United States | 74 |
| Texas | 62 |
| New York | 58 |
| Pennsylvania | 57 |
| North Carolina | 53 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedHill-Scott, Karen; Wilson, Charles Z. – Education and Urban Society, 1977
The rationale for this article is to propose that certain types of programs be matched with the appropriate evaluation techniques so that valid information can be provided to the funding agency, decision-makers, and the public. (Author)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Economics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewedWorthern, Blaine R. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1977
Attempts to provide school practitioners with a short list of very general characteristics, most of a non-technical nature, which should exist in any good evaluation study and to show how they might be applied by school personnel to judge an evaluation study being planned or conducted in their system. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Interviews
Shelgren, Margaret – Phi Delta Kappan, 1977
Hawaii's experiment with the 3 on 2 plan in which three teachers are assigned to two classes has been judged not worth the cost because students in the program do not do any better on math and reading tests than do students in regular classrooms. (IRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Programs, Primary Education
Peer reviewedNuehring, Elane M.; Pascone, Anne B. – Social Work, 1986
The use of single-subject designs in peer review, in utilization review, and in other quality-assurance audits is encouraged. Presents an overview of the methodologies of single-subject designs and quality assurance, and provides examples of cases in which single-subject techniques furnished relevant quality assurance documentation. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Audits (Verification), Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation, Program Evaluation
Stile, Stephen W. – Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 1987
In this discussion of the Alternating Treatment Design (ATD) in early childhood special education programs, two studies illustrate the use of ATD for comparing a treatment with no treatment and for comparing two or more treatments. An eight-step procedure is outlined to facilitate classroom application. (Author)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Kelly, J. Terence – Career Training, 1985
The Standards of Academic Progress system at Miami-Dade Community College is explored. Elements of this system are discussed: reduction of course loan with appropriate educational interventions, some period of separation from the college, two-track monitoring system, and administrative review of all students at the end of each term. (CT)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedYeaton, William; Sechrest, Lee – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
In no-difference research, no differences are found among groups or conditions. This article summarizes the existing commentary on such research. The characteristics of no-difference research, its acceptance by the research community, strategies for conducting such studies, and its centrality within the experimental and nonexperimental paradigms…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedAlkin, Marvin C.; Patton, Michael Quinn – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
The user-oriented and utilization-focused evaluation design of the two-year Caribbean Agricultural Extension Project, funded by Aid to International Development, is reviewed. The evaluation scope, stakeholders, evaluation team credibility, official approval of evaluation, and confidence in the evaluation process are addressed, within a…
Descriptors: Economic Development, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewedShapiro, Jonathan Z.; Blackwell, David L. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
The design and implementation of a partnership evaluation at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana, during the 1985-86 academic year are discussed. Within a conversational format, a strategy is outlined for sharing evaluation responsibilities between the client and evaluator. (TJH)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewedRobottom, Ian – Journal of Environmental Education, 1985
Proposes that a critical approach to evaluation in environmental education is needed to adequately address current epistemological, ethical, and procedural dilemmas. Offers perspectives on the scientific/analytic and critical evaluation schemes in respect to their epistemology, locus of control, and interests served. Emphasizes the socially…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Philosophy, Environmental Education, Epistemology
Peer reviewedLincoln, Yvonna S. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1985
The ERS Standards, together with those of the Joint Committee, symbolize a commitment to the professionalization of evaluation. The two sets of standards differ on five points: (1) perceived linearity of evaluation activities; (2) preferred and permitted approaches; (3) purposes of evaluation; (4) obligations to clients and stakeholders; and (5)…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Models, Needs Assessment
Peer reviewedBeinecke, Richard H. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1986
Oversight is defined in a broad manner, encompassing a wide variety of mechanisms within the mental health field. Implications for mental health practice brought out by these descriptions of mechanisms are discussed to illustrate the utility of them in better understanding oversight practices. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Health Education, Mental Health Programs
Peer reviewedReitz, Andrew L. – Education and Treatment of Children, 1985
The paper presents a definition of program evaluation for behavior disordered students and summarizes the previous four papers on describing clients, natural environments, treatment processes, and outcomes. Areas for future emphasis are noted. (CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Models
Clowes, Darrel A. – Journal of Developmental & Remedial Education, 1984
Identifies ways in which remedial/developmental programs are like and unlike other academic programs for evaluation purposes. Offers a four-stage evaluation model representing four different levels of activity and points at which evaluation can be conducted. (DMM)
Descriptors: Developmental Studies Programs, Evaluation Methods, Models, Postsecondary Education
Peer reviewedChelimsky, Eleanor – Evaluation Review, 1985
Four aspects of the relationship between auditing and evaluation in their approaches to program assessment are examined: (1) their different origins; (2) the definitions and purposes of both, and the questions they seek to answer; (3) contrasting viewpoints and emphases of auditors and evaluators; and (4) commonalities of interest and potential…
Descriptors: Accountability, Accounting, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods


