Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 5 |
| Program Evaluation | 5 |
| Models | 3 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
| Objectives | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Administration | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Business | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 5 |
Author
| Brinkerhoff, Robert O., Ed. | 1 |
| Kiresuk, Thomas J. | 1 |
| Rallis, Sharon F., Ed. | 1 |
| Reichardt, Charles S., Ed. | 1 |
| Scriven, Michael | 1 |
| Wargo, Michael J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
| Collected Works - Serials | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWargo, Michael J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
An overview of how program evaluation is organized within the federal government is presented. Using examples from three federal agencies, the author shows how evaluation units are formed, defines their functions, and discusses the barriers that must be overcome to manage a federal program evaluation office effectively. (Author)
Descriptors: Administration, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Organizational Objectives
Peer reviewedKiresuk, Thomas J.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The consumer of a service is of primary importance when defining groups most concerned with program impact. Program effectiveness for the consumer may be increased through the use of certain guiding principles based on the extension of existing quality assurance and program evaluation methodologies. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Accountability, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Human Services
Peer reviewedReichardt, Charles S., Ed.; Rallis, Sharon F., Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1994
The eight articles of this issue examine the nature of differences that arise between qualitative and quantitative researchers in program evaluation in terms of goals and epistemologies. The origins of these differences and their consequences are explored. Authors represent both perspectives but do not defend their ideological turfs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Conflict, Epistemology, Evaluation Methods, Ideology
Peer reviewedBrinkerhoff, Robert O., Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1989
Seven papers are presented that demonstrate new directions and practices in the evaluation of training programs. Different perspectives and approaches are represented, but in each case the evaluation described has been successful in making trainers more effective and accountable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Business, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedScriven, Michael – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
Seven chapters present 31 propositions challenging traditional ideas about the nature and practice of program evaluation. Methods to improve evaluation models and approaches and ways to address intermediate and advanced evaluation issues are explored. The discussion also serves as an introduction to the most analytical and comprehensive of the…
Descriptors: Bias, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization


