Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational Researcher | 8 |
Author
Boruch, Robert F. | 2 |
Bunda, Mary Anne | 1 |
Carter, Launor | 1 |
Cordray, David S. | 1 |
Fincher, Cameron | 1 |
Ginsburg, Alan | 1 |
McDaniels, Garry L. | 1 |
McKenna, Michael C. | 1 |
Walpole, Sharon | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education Amendments 1978 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McKenna, Michael C.; Walpole, Sharon – Educational Researcher, 2010
The evaluation of Reading First, the U.S. Department of Education's multibillion-dollar K-3 initiative, although flawed, nevertheless offers instructive guidance for gauging the impact of future initiatives. After providing an overview of the program, its evaluation, and the historical context of federal initiatives, the authors outline…
Descriptors: Scientific Principles, Measures (Individuals), Educational Change, Evaluation

Fincher, Cameron – Educational Researcher, 1974
Evaluates the activities of the Committee on Basic Research in Education (COBRE), pointing out that its work was based on the premises that basic research is oriented to the academic disciplines, that its outcomes are scientific knowledge as opposed to products or solutions, and that its outcomes are unpredictable. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Federal Aid, Federal Programs, Financial Support

Boruch, Robert F.; Cordray, David S. – Educational Researcher, 1981
Answers criticisms by Mary Anne Bunda, Ernest House, and Mary Kennedy. Discusses, among other issues, legal authorization for the use of higher quality evaluation designs and the use of evaluation research results. (GC)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs

McDaniels, Garry L. – Educational Researcher, 1975
Notes that even with the problems identified in this paper, consistent, positive results are appearing in preliminary reports. Equally important, the data seem to support a number of reasonable notions about the impact of distinctive curricula on students. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Federal Programs, Minority Group Children, Performance Criteria

Carter, Launor – Educational Researcher, 1977
Presents a case study of how the review and clearance procedures are operating for evaluation instruments used in collecting information in connection with studies for the U.S. Office of Education. The review procedures are defective: They consume too much time. They are very costly. The results are unproductive. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Educational Programs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs

Bunda, Mary Anne – Educational Researcher, 1981
Two issues in the Holtzman Project bear examination and reconsideration: (1) the recommendation for the use of field experiments as an exclusive "authorized" evaluation design, and (2) the focus on the needs of the federal client, and the apparent lack of concern for clients at the state and local levels. (GC)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Information Utilization

Boruch, Robert F.; And Others – Educational Researcher, 1981
Summarizes a report from Northwestern University that reviewed Federal evaluation practices of federally supported educational programs at the national, state, and local levels. Considers: (1) evaluation purposes and methods; (2) evaluators' capabilities; (3) use of evaluation results; and (4) ways that evaluation procedures/practices can be…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Federal Legislation

Ginsburg, Alan; And Others – Educational Researcher, 1992
Wise use of Department of Education program evaluation funds is considered. The following current principal evaluation areas are discussed: (1) compensatory education; (2) bilingual education; (3) postsecondary education; (4) vocational education; (5) early childhood education; (6) drug education; (7) dropout prevention; (8) special education and…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Compensatory Education, Dropout Prevention, Drug Education