Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Demonstration Programs | 7 |
| Evaluation Problems | 7 |
| Program Effectiveness | 7 |
| Program Evaluation | 6 |
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Educational Policy | 2 |
| Educational Vouchers | 2 |
| Federal Programs | 2 |
| Inferences | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Research Reports | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education and the Public… | 2 |
| Evaluation Review | 2 |
| Early Child Development and… | 1 |
| Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
Author
| DeStefano, Lizanne | 2 |
| Anderson, Billie S. | 1 |
| Belfield, Clive | 1 |
| Cobb, Casey D. | 1 |
| Crawford, Myra A. | 1 |
| Hardin, J. Michael | 1 |
| Orwin, Robert G. | 1 |
| Russell, Toya V. | 1 |
| Slavenas, Rosemarie | 1 |
| Woodby, Lesa L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Wisconsin | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wisconsin Knowledge and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hardin, J. Michael; Anderson, Billie S.; Woodby, Lesa L.; Crawford, Myra A.; Russell, Toya V. – Evaluation Review, 2008
This article explores the statistical methodologies used in demonstration and effectiveness studies when the treatments are applied across multiple settings. The importance of evaluating and how to evaluate these types of studies are discussed. As an alternative to standard methodology, the authors of this article offer an empirical binomial…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Alternative Assessment, Data Analysis, Statistical Studies
Belfield, Clive – Education and the Public Interest Center, 2009
A report from the School Choice Demonstration Project examines issues concerning the funding formula used for the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP). It finds that the program generates a net saving to taxpayers in Wisconsin but imposes a significant fiscal burden on taxpayers in Milwaukee. However, these findings depend significantly on how…
Descriptors: Funding Formulas, School Choice, Demonstration Programs, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewedSlavenas, Rosemarie – Early Child Development and Care, 1993
Summarizes literature on early childhood (EC) program evaluation, presents an overview of the national standards addressing quality in EC programs, and presents the results of a survey of the evaluation practices of 18 model EC programs. Found that the programs' evaluation procedures were varied, well-developed, open-ended, and process-orientated.…
Descriptors: Demonstration Programs, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewedOrwin, Robert G.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1994
Evaluation findings of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Community Demonstration Program show few clear indications of the effectiveness of case management approaches. This article identifies phenomena that explain the lack of positive effects and suggests that evaluation problems may explain apparent negative…
Descriptors: Access to Health Care, Community Programs, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods
Cobb, Casey D. – Education and the Public Interest Center, 2009
The study under review is the second-year evaluation report of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP), a publicly funded voucher program that allows low-income students in Milwaukee to attend secular and religious private schools in that city. Its primary finding is that there were no overall statistically significant differences in…
Descriptors: Research Reports, Research Methodology, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
DeStefano, Lizanne – 1991
This paper examines the issues arising when a set of federally funded model demonstration projects, the secondary curricula/student transition projects of the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, were obligated by federal initiative to improve the amount, quality, and use of evaluation. These issues included: (1) the nature of…
Descriptors: Accountability, Demonstration Programs, Disabilities, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewedDeStefano, Lizanne – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1992
Citing the signaling and charged use distinction, examines federal expectations and need for evaluation data and extent of local capabilities to meet those expectations when secondary/transition model demonstration projects, funded by the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, were obligated to improve amount, quality, and use of…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

Direct link
