Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Mild Intellectual Disability | 1 |
| Moderate Intellectual… | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Prompting | 1 |
| Reading Instruction | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| Sight Method | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 1 |
Author
| Aldosiry, Norah | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Saudi Arabia (Riyadh) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAldosiry, Norah – International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2022
This study compares the effectiveness and efficiency of constant time delay (CTD) and simultaneous prompting (SP) to teach decoding and word reading to four students, 7 to 9 years of age, with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the mild to moderate range. An adapted alternating treatment design was implemented to assess the two methods. The results…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Program Effectiveness, Prompting, Time
