Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Inquiry | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Science Instruction | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Elementary School Science | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hand, Brian | 2 |
| Cavagnetto, Andy R. | 1 |
| Jang, Jeong-yoon | 1 |
| Norton-Meier, Lori | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJang, Jeong-yoon; Hand, Brian – Research in Science Education, 2017
This study investigated the value of using a scaffolded critique framework to promote two different types of writing--argumentative writing and explanatory writing--with different purposes within an argument-based inquiry approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. A quasi-experimental design with sixth and seventh grade…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Persuasive Discourse, Writing Assignments
Cavagnetto, Andy R.; Hand, Brian; Norton-Meier, Lori – Research in Science Education, 2011
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of two strategies for negotiating the question for exploration during science inquiry on student achievement and teachers' perceptions. The study is set in the context of the Science Writing Heuristic. The first strategy (small group) consisted of each group of four students negotiating a question…
Descriptors: Science Achievement, Teaching Methods, Inquiry, Science Instruction
