Descriptor
| Problem Solving | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Cognitive Tests | 2 |
| Eye Movements | 2 |
| Induction | 2 |
| Logical Thinking | 2 |
| Children | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Dillon, Ronna F. | 4 |
| Donow, Carolyn | 1 |
| Stevenson-Hicks, Randy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 2 |
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 2 |
| Nowicki Strickland Locus of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDillon, Ronna F.; Donow, Carolyn – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
College undergraduates were given Zelniker and Jeffrey's modification of the Matching Familiar Figures Test to assess its psychometric credibility and construct validity for adult problem solvers. The modified test has improved internal consistency and stability over the original. The construct's possible correlation with general problem solving…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Higher Education, Problem Solving, Test Reliability
Dillon, Ronna F.; Stevenson-Hicks, Randy – 1983
A study examined the extent to which common knowledge structures and the presence of common performance components are important factors in reasoning. The eye fixations of 37 college students were recorded as they solved four types of complex inductive reasoning tasks: (1) verbal analogies, (2) figural analogies, (3) verbal series completions, and…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Eye Fixations, Eye Movements
Peer reviewedDillon, Ronna F. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980
Descriptors: Children, Classification, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewedDillon, Ronna F. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1985
Undergraduates were given complex figural analogies items, and eye movements were observed under three types of feedback: (1) elaborate feedback; (2) subjects verbalized their thinking and application of rules; and (3) no feedback. Both feedback conditions enhanced the rule-governed information processing during inductive reasoning. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Feedback, Higher Education, Individual Testing


