Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Bayesian Statistics | 3 |
| Data Interpretation | 3 |
| Probability | 3 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Statistical Inference | 2 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Death | 1 |
| Drug Therapy | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Deke, John | 1 |
| Finucane, Mariel | 1 |
| Held, Leonhard | 1 |
| López Puga, Jorge | 1 |
| Matthews, Robert | 1 |
| Ott, Manuela | 1 |
| Pawel, Samuel | 1 |
| Thal, Daniel | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Held, Leonhard; Matthews, Robert; Ott, Manuela; Pawel, Samuel – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
It is now widely accepted that the standard inferential toolkit used by the scientific research community--null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST)--is not fit for purpose. Yet despite the threat posed to the scientific enterprise, there is no agreement concerning alternative approaches for evidence assessment. This lack of consensus reflects…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Statistical Inference, Hypothesis Testing, Credibility
Deke, John; Finucane, Mariel; Thal, Daniel – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2022
BASIE is a framework for interpreting impact estimates from evaluations. It is an alternative to null hypothesis significance testing. This guide walks researchers through the key steps of applying BASIE, including selecting prior evidence, reporting impact estimates, interpreting impact estimates, and conducting sensitivity analyses. The guide…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Educational Research, Data Interpretation, Hypothesis Testing
López Puga, Jorge – Teaching Statistics: An International Journal for Teachers, 2014
The aprioristic (classical, naïve and symmetric) and frequentist interpretations of probability are commonly known. Bayesian or subjective interpretation of probability is receiving increasing attention. This paper describes an activity to help students differentiate between the three types of probability interpretations.
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Data Interpretation, Instructional Materials

Peer reviewed
Direct link
