Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 5 |
| Pretests Posttests | 5 |
| Statistical Significance | 5 |
| Statistical Analysis | 4 |
| Pretesting | 3 |
| True Scores | 3 |
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 2 |
| Control Groups | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Raw Scores | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cascio, Wayne F. | 1 |
| Cross, Lawrence H. | 1 |
| Horakova, Tereza | 1 |
| Houska, Milan | 1 |
| Kurtines, William M. | 1 |
| Lane, Carolyn E. | 1 |
| Marston, Paul T., Borich,… | 1 |
| Vanhove, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Czech Republic | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vanhove, Jan – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2015
I discuss three common practices that obfuscate or invalidate the statistical analysis of randomized controlled interventions in applied linguistics. These are (a) checking whether randomization produced groups that are balanced on a number of possibly relevant covariates, (b) using repeated measures ANOVA to analyze pretest-posttest designs, and…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Intervention, Applied Linguistics, Statistical Analysis
Horakova, Tereza; Houska, Milan – International Education Studies, 2014
The paper shows how the methodology for a pedagogical experiment can be improved through including the pre-research stage. If the experiment has the form of a test procedure, an improvement of methodology can be achieved using for example the methods of statistical and didactic analysis of tests which are traditionally used in other areas, i.e.…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Educational Experiments, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedCascio, Wayne F.; Kurtines, William M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A test of significance for identifying individuals who are most influenced by an experimental treatment as measured by pre-post test change score is presented. The technique requires true difference scores, the reliability of obtained differences, and their standard error of measurement. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Measurement Techniques, Pretesting, Pretests Posttests
Marston, Paul T., Borich, Gary D. – 1977
The four main approaches to measuring treatment effects in schools; raw gain, residual gain, covariance, and true scores; were compared. A simulation study showed true score analysis produced a large number of Type-I errors. When corrected for this error, this method showed the least power of the four. This outcome was clearly the result of the…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement
Cross, Lawrence H.; Lane, Carolyn E. – 1977
Action research often necessitates the use of intact groups for the comparison of educational treatments or programs. This paper considers several analytical methods that might be used for such situations when pretest scores indicate that these intact groups differ significantly initially. The methods considered include gain score analysis of…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Control Groups


