Descriptor
| Pretesting | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Programs | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Job Training | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Training | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cornwell, J. B. – Training, 1981
Significant control of efficiency and quality in delivering training is achieved by specifically defining the target trainee in terms of prerequisite abilities and learning needs (learning objectives), measuring those abilities by prerequisite testing and pretesting, and responding to differences in planned ways. (CT)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Efficiency, Measurement Techniques, Pretesting
Mirsberger, Gerald E. – Training, 1974
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Interviews
Novack, Stanley R. – Training, 1976
A statistical method, Fishers Table of t (or t ratio), is used to determine the statistical significance of a comparison of results from pretests and post-tests of knowledge and skill taken by training program participants. A statistically significant improvement can demonstrate training effectiveness. (MS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Programs, Evaluation Methods, Pretesting
