Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
International Journal of… | 3 |
Author
Dorothee Brovelli | 1 |
Hendrik Lohse-Bossenz | 1 |
Hsu, Ying-Shao | 1 |
Jen, Tsung-Hau | 1 |
Kuo, Che-Yu | 1 |
Markus Wilhelm | 1 |
Tamir, Pinchas | 1 |
Valerie Amacker | 1 |
Wu, Hsin-Kai | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Switzerland | 1 |
Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Valerie Amacker; Hendrik Lohse-Bossenz; Markus Wilhelm; Dorothee Brovelli – International Journal of Science Education, 2024
The field of geometrical optics features a broad knowledge base concerning conceptual learning difficulties and student conceptions. However, in contrast to other areas of physics, no widely used standard test instrument exists to assess middle school students' conceptual knowledge of geometrical optics. This is even more true for other areas of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Middle School Students, Physics, Science Instruction
Kuo, Che-Yu; Wu, Hsin-Kai; Jen, Tsung-Hau; Hsu, Ying-Shao – International Journal of Science Education, 2015
The potential of computer-based assessments for capturing complex learning outcomes has been discussed; however, relatively little is understood about how to leverage such potential for summative and accountability purposes. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities (MASIA) to…
Descriptors: Multimedia Materials, Program Development, Program Validation, Test Construction

Tamir, Pinchas – International Journal of Science Education, 1999
Describes the validity and reliability of the Self-Report Knowledge Inventory (SRKI) and the Opportunity to Learn Inventory (OTLI) as self-assessment tools. Both instruments were found to be friendly, relatively easy to design, easy to respond to, easy to score, time-saving, non-threatening, valid, and reliable for comparing and making decisions…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Pretesting, Reliability, Science Instruction