Descriptor
| Handicap Identification | 18 |
| Predictive Validity | 18 |
| Screening Tests | 13 |
| Test Validity | 8 |
| Evaluation Methods | 7 |
| Preschool Education | 7 |
| Primary Education | 7 |
| High Risk Students | 6 |
| Predictive Measurement | 6 |
| Early Identification | 5 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 10 |
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 5 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 8 |
| Practitioners | 3 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada (London) | 1 |
| Finland | 1 |
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Battelle Developmental… | 1 |
| Denver Developmental… | 1 |
| Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Improving the Predictive Validity of the Draw-A-Man Test as a Screening Device for School Readiness.
Simner, Marvin L. – 1982
An item analysis of Harris' scoring system for the Goodenough-Harris Draw-A-Man Test was conducted by comparing sets of protocols obtained in the early fall of kindergarten from children whose overall in-class academic performance placed them either in an at-risk category (N=21) or at the top of their class (N=38) by the end of the school year.…
Descriptors: Handicap Identification, High Risk Students, Kindergarten Children, Predictive Validity
Culbertson, William C.; Docherty, Edward M., Jr. – 1980
Learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, and unclassified male students originally tested with the Elizur Test of Psycho-Organicity (ETPO) when they were 6 to 11 years of age (time 1), were reassessed four years later (time 2) with the same instrument. Examinees were required to duplicate geometric and colored block designs, and to memorize five…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Emotional Disturbances, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Mardell-Czudnowski, Carol; And Others – Diagnostique, 1988
The study evaluated the predictive validity of DIAL-R, which identifies children aged 2-6 with potential learning problems or giftedness. Based on longitudinal data for 312 elementary-level children, DIAL-R scores were found to have good concurrent sensitivity and specificity but did not correspond well with subsequent special education placement.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Diagnostic Tests, Disabilities, Educational Diagnosis
Glascoe, Frances P.; Borowitz, Kathleen C. – Diagnostique, 1988
The Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) and an expressive language measure were administered to 114 children (aged 24 to 74 months) suspected of developmental difficulties. The DDST did not identify the majority of children who failed the expressive language screening, even after cutoff scores were made more rigorous. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Evaluation Methods, Expressive Language, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewedBadian, Nathlie A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
Scores on the Holbrook Screening Battery, administered at age four, correctly predicted 89 percent of good readers and 75 percent of poor readers in a sample of 116 eighth graders. Characteristics differentiating good and poor readers included birth history, family history of learning disability, speech delay, and socioeconomic status. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Followup Studies, Handicap Identification, Junior High Schools, Predictive Validity
Merrell, Kenneth W.; Mauk, Gary W. – Diagnostique, 1993
The Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) was administered to 121 young children, and parents rated them with the Social Skills Rating System 2-3 years after entry into the study. Correlations between the two measures revealed very weak to modest relationships, providing limited support for the BDI as a predictive measure of future…
Descriptors: Behavior Development, Behavior Rating Scales, Disabilities, Early Childhood Education
Hunter, Maxwell W.; Ballash, Joan B. – Diagnostique, 1990
The Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) and the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition (SBIV) were administered to 95 elementary students referred because of either learning problems or potential giftedness. SIT scores predicted SBIV verbal scores more accurately than composite scores. Overall the SIT predicted SBIV scores better for students with learning…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Gifted, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Rafoth, Mary Ann K. – 1984
The study hypothesized that scatter analysis of the three subtest scale scores on the Meeting Street School Screening Test (gross motor patterning, visual-perceptual-motor, and language) given at the beginning of first grade would prove to be a more accurate predictor of future placement in a learning disabilities program than the cut-off total…
Descriptors: Early Identification, Elementary Education, Followup Studies, Handicap Identification
Wilson, Barry J.; Reichmuth, Monica – 1984
Early screening programs to determine learning problems in preschool children are evaluated. A review of early identification literature indicates considerable difficulty in describing screening results and determining when a screening program accurately identifies those students believed to be "at risk." The authors propose several…
Descriptors: Early Identification, Handicap Identification, High Risk Students, Predictive Measurement
Stennett, R. G.; Isaacs, Lorna M. – 1979
The paper reports on a 1 year followup study to establish the short term predictive validity of an early identification system used in London, Ontario (Canada) for kindergarten and first grade high risk students. Ratings of the students by the evaluation teams in January were compared with the students' actual placements as of the following…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academic Failure, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries
ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children, Reston, VA. – 1987
This one-page abstract summarizes "The Miller Assessment for Preschoolers: A Longitudinal and Predictive Study" by Lucy Miller, which examined the predictive validity of an early childhood screening instrument to identify children who have or are at risk of developing handicapping conditions. The Miller Assessment for Preschoolers (MAP)…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Early Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedOakland, Thomas; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1990
To identify classroom behaviors that differentiate primary-level students with learning disabilities (LD) from their nondisabled peers, two scales of 83 items each were devised and piloted. Two subscales and 18 individual items were found to discriminate students later classified as LD and those referred but not subsequently classified as LD.…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedCarran, Deborah T.; Scott, Keith G. – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1992
Epidemiological techniques were used to reanalyze studies that had longitudinally tracked preschool or kindergarten children, to determine results of screens for the identification of educationally at-risk children. A paradigm shift is recommended, away from longitudinal studies for predictive validity and toward risk analysis and interpretation.…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Early Identification, Epidemiology, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedMorrison, Delmont; Mantzicopoulos, Panayota – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1990
The predictive validity of SEARCH and of academic achievement tests for identifying children at risk for reading problems was compared, with 668 kindergarten children. The use of various cutoff scores for SEARCH and the application of a 2-factor scoring system resulted in high rates of false negatives and false positives. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Beginning Reading, Handicap Identification
Tuunainen, Kari – 1985
Adapted screening devices and teacher observation were used in a 1974 study of 1003 Finnish students (ages 6-8) in an effort to predict future learning difficulties. Six areas were assessed: gross motor skills, sensory-motor integration, perceptual-motor skills, arithmetic skills, socioemotional adjustment, and verbal ability. In a follow-up study…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Followup Studies, Foreign Countries, Handicap Identification
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

