NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Milner, Joel S.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986
To provide cross-validation data for the Child Abuse Potential Inventory, classification rates were determined for 220 physical child abusers and matched control subjects. Using all protocols, a discriminant analysis indicated the Abuse scale correctly classified 85.4% of the subjects, with 82.7% of the abusers and 88.2% of the control subjects…
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Classification, High Risk Persons, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Milner, Joel S.; Wimberley, Ronald C. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
The Child Abuse Potential Inventory significantly discriminated between abusers and nonabusers. The factors were distress, rigidity, child with problems, problems from family and others, unhappiness, loneliness, and negative concept of child and of self. Rigidity, unhappiness, and distress factors were most meaningful in understanding why some…
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Individual Characteristics, Parent Child Relationship, Parents
Milner, Joel S.; Robertson, Kevin R. – Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 1989
A study examined the responses of 89 physical child abusers and 108 comparison subjects to the Child Abuse Potential Inventory to determine whether the inventory's response inconsistency scale could be used for screening for physical child abuse. The scale was rejected as a reliable or valid measure. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Predictive Measurement, Psychological Patterns, Reliability