Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Competition | 2 |
| Learning Analytics | 2 |
| Mathematics Tests | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| National Competency Tests | 2 |
| Prediction | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational Data… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textPatel, Nirmal; Sharma, Aditya; Shah, Tirth; Lomas, Derek – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2021
Process Analysis is an emerging approach to discover meaningful knowledge from temporal educational data. The study presented in this paper shows how we used Process Analysis methods on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test data for modeling and predicting student test-taking behavior. Our process-oriented data exploration…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Methods, Prediction
Bosch, Nigel – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2021
Automatic machine learning (AutoML) methods automate the time-consuming, feature-engineering process so that researchers produce accurate student models more quickly and easily. In this paper, we compare two AutoML feature engineering methods in the context of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data mining competition. The…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Learning Analytics, Models, National Competency Tests
