NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
To Bargain or Govern: The Impact of Yeshiva on Private and Public Sector Collective Bargaining in Higher Education.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benson, Dena Elliott – Ohio Northern University Law Review, 1980
The history of excluding supervisory employees from National Labor Relations Board protection is traced and the Yeshiva University case and implications for higher education are outlined. It is concluded that further court action is needed so as not to further undermine the university's effectiveness. (Journal availability: Ohio N. Univ. Law…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Higher Education
Labor Law--Managers of the Classroom, Private University Faculty at Yeshiva University Are Not Professional Employees under the NLRA--NLRB v. Yeshiva University.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pagano, Philip G. – Creighton Law Review, 1981
Previous faculty National Labor Relations Board status decisions are analyzed to discern the rationale behind the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to follow prior holdings of the Board. The Board can now either set a procedure for determining faculty status or declare faculty protected, forcing Congress to address the issue directly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Federal Legislation
The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Finkin, Matthew W. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Viewed from the perspective of administrative law, labor law, or just higher education, the Yeshiva decision does not make sense. It would be appropriate in future litigation to compel the court to do what it refused to do here, that is to address the extent to which the industrial analogy applies to colleges and universities. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Court Litigation
NLRB v. Yeshiva University: Faculty as Managerial Employees under the NLRA.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Twomey, David P. – American Business Law Journal, 1981
A congressional amendment to the National Labor Relations Act appears to be the most viable means of providing faculty members the bargaining rights held by all other professionals in this country, after the Yeshiva University decision. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Faculty Workload
Labor Law: Collective Bargaining at Private Nonprofit Educational Institutions.
Johnson, Roberta R. – Washburn Law Journal, 1980
By acknowledging a specific setting, as at Yeshiva University, where faculty are legally considered managerial, the court lays a foundation on which private colleges may attempt to build, by trying to fit the "mature" governing structure outlined in the court decision. Journal available from the School of Law, Washburn University,…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Higher Education
Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva University Decision.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Barbara A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
The Yeshiva decision shows that several actions must be taken to clarify or resolve issues: several legal terms must be redefined, more comprehensive fact-finding is needed, and higher education collective bargaining must be better understood to distinguish faculty governance roles more clearly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Court Litigation
Collective Bargaining in Higher Education--Faculty's Role as Professional Employees Will Not Preclude Their Classification as Managerial Employees.
Sabalot, Deborah A. – Loyola Law Review, 1980
It is submitted that, in the court decision on Yeshiva University and collective bargaining, the court failed to provide the National Labor Relations Board with any clear guidelines for applying its managerial context test. The decision's consistency with the National Labor Relations Act's intent is questioned. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation
Two Trends in Academic Collective Bargaining: A Faculty Representative's Perspective.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Franke, Ann H. – Journal of Law and Education, 1984
Discusses two new challenges that face faculty bargaining organizations: first, the Supreme Court's decision in "NLRB vs. Yeshiva University" that faculties exercising power over governance of their institutions have managerial status that excludes them from protection under the National Labor Relations Act, and, second, the current…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Governing Councils, Faculty Organizations, Financial Problems
Labor Law--Constitutional Law--Private University Faculty Excluded from NLRA Coverage Under Managerial Exemption--NLRB v. Yeshiva University.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kegelman, Joan B. – Seton Hall Law Review, 1980
The exclusion of faculty members as managerial employees may seriously disadvantage all professional employees, the very group the National Labor Relations Act was amended to protect. (Journal availability: Dennis & Company, 251 Main St., Buffalo, NY 14203.) (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Constitutional Law
Collective Bargaining and the Professoriate: What the Law Says.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Malamud, Deborah C. – Academe, 1998
Discusses "National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva University," which ruled that college faculty were managers and thereby excluded from collective bargaining, focusing on why the Supreme Court classified professors as managers, whether the Court did something unusual in this case, or whether faculty is simply the unlucky vanguard of a…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Employer Employee Relationship
The Implications of the Yeshiva University Decision for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Public Institutions of Higher Education.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bodner, Gerald A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Amidst widely disparate predictions as to the effect the Yeshiva decision will have in higher education, traditional legal wisdom would suggest awaiting further NLRB and court decisions for guidance on Yeshiva's impact on different institutions, especially given the various existing and potential unionization arrangements. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Employer Employee Relationship
Private College Faculty as Managers: An Epmirical Test under "Yeshiva." ASHE 1986 Annual Meeting Paper.
Nash, Nancy S. – 1985
The validity of the U.S. Supreme Court's assertion that faculty members performed certain tasks that made them managers in the case of "National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva University" was examined. The following concerns were addressed: whether faculty authority varies between Liberal Arts I and Liberal Arts II colleges, as defined…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrators, College Faculty, College Presidents
The Legal and Economic Status of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education. Proceedings of the Annual Conference (9th, April 1981).
Douglas, Joel M., Ed. – 1981
Proceedings of the 1981 conference on the legal and economic status of collective bargaining in higher education, sponsored by the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, are presented. Papers and authors are as follows: "Yeshiva Shock Waves" (David Kuechle); "The Yeshiva Case:…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Arbitration, Collective Bargaining, College Administration