Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Intellectual Disciplines | 1 |
| Mathematics | 1 |
| Performance | 1 |
| Physics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Physical Review Physics… | 1 |
Author
| Daniela Kugelmann | 1 |
| Jochen Kuhn | 1 |
| Jonathan Bortfeldt | 1 |
| Jörg Schreiber | 1 |
| Markus Berndt | 1 |
| Martin R. Fischer | 1 |
| Stefan Küchemann | 1 |
| Steffen Steinert | 1 |
| Verena Ruf | 1 |
| Yavuz Dinc | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVerena Ruf; Yavuz Dinc; Stefan Küchemann; Markus Berndt; Steffen Steinert; Daniela Kugelmann; Jonathan Bortfeldt; Jörg Schreiber; Martin R. Fischer; Jochen Kuhn – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2024
Graphical representations of data are common in many disciplines. Previous research has found that physics students appear to have better graph comprehension skills than students from social science disciplines, regardless of the task context. However, the graph comprehension skills of physics students have not yet been compared with (veterinary)…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Graphs, Comprehension, College Freshmen
