Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Autism | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Moderate Intellectual… | 2 |
| Pervasive Developmental… | 2 |
| Prompting | 2 |
| Special Education | 2 |
| Age Groups | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ault, Melinda Jones | 1 |
| Flick, Allison | 1 |
| Lane, Justin D. | 1 |
| Pennington, Robert | 1 |
| Shepley, Collin | 1 |
| Smith-Wehr, Kendra | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Clinical Evaluation of… | 1 |
| Preschool Language Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShepley, Collin; Lane, Justin D.; Ault, Melinda Jones – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
We systematically reviewed more than 25 years of applied research examining the system of least prompts response prompting procedure with individuals with disabilities. We identified 123 peer-reviewed studies including 413 participants receiving instruction with the system of least prompts. A total of 252 experimental designs were evaluated, with…
Descriptors: Prompting, Evidence Based Practice, Bias, Research Reports
Pennington, Robert; Flick, Allison; Smith-Wehr, Kendra – Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 2018
In the current study, we examined the effects of response prompting strategies (i.e., constant time delay, system of least prompts) and frames on sentence writing for three participants, ages 7 to 12, with moderate intellectual disability. We used a concurrent multiple probe across behaviors design to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention…
Descriptors: Prompting, Teaching Methods, Moderate Intellectual Disability, Time
