Descriptor
| Character Recognition | 2 |
| Cognitive Ability | 2 |
| Cognitive Development | 2 |
| Conceptual Tempo | 2 |
| Pattern Recognition | 2 |
| Young Children | 2 |
Source
| Developmental Psychology | 2 |
Author
| Block, Jack | 1 |
| Kagan, Jerome | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKagan, Jerome – Developmental Psychology, 1987
Reply by Jerome Kagan to a recent article by Block, Gjerde, and Block (1986) which questions the validity of the construct of reflection-impulsivity. Kagan alleges flaws in the logic of the authors' (Block, Gjerde, Block) position and in the inferences drawn from their data. (Author/RWB)
Descriptors: Character Recognition, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Conceptual Tempo
Peer reviewedBlock, Jack – Developmental Psychology, 1987
Responds to the arguments and evidence adduced by Kagan (1987) in his reply to the Block, Gjerde, and Block (1986) study questioning the validity of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT) as a measure of "reflection-impulsivity." (Author)
Descriptors: Character Recognition, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Conceptual Tempo


