NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ariel, Robert; Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; Witherby, Amber E.; Tauber, Sarah K. – Educational Psychology Review, 2021
When people make judgments of learning (JOLs) after studying paired associates, the process they engage in to monitor their learning can directly enhance learning for some types of material (Soderstrom et al. 2015). The current experiments investigated whether JOLs directly enhance learning educationally relevant texts. Across 5 experiments (N =…
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Evaluative Thinking, Reading Comprehension, Textbooks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tekin, Eylul; Roediger, Henry L., III – Metacognition and Learning, 2021
Evidence is mixed concerning whether delayed judgments of learning (JOLs) enhance learning and if so, whether their benefit is similar to retrieval practice. One potential explanation for the mixed findings is the truncated search hypothesis, which states that not all delayed JOLs lead to a full-blown covert retrieval attempt. In three…
Descriptors: Retention (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Cues, Review (Reexamination)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Gabriel I.; Marsh, Richard L.; Hicks, Jason L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Five experiments were conducted to address the question of whether source information could be accessed in the absence of being able to recall an item. The authors used a paired-associate learning paradigm in which cue-target word pairs were studied, and target recall was requested in the presence of the cue. When target recall failed,…
Descriptors: Memory, Cues, Recall (Psychology), Paired Associate Learning