Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 8 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 35 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 174 |
Descriptor
| Operant Conditioning | 1368 |
| Behavior Change | 662 |
| Reinforcement | 464 |
| Exceptional Child Research | 317 |
| Mental Retardation | 267 |
| Responses | 172 |
| Exceptional Child Education | 152 |
| Behavior Problems | 143 |
| Positive Reinforcement | 135 |
| Behavior Modification | 132 |
| Teaching Methods | 131 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Lattal, Kennon A. | 6 |
| Bricker, William A. | 5 |
| Haring, Norris G. | 5 |
| Pedrini, D. T. | 5 |
| Repp, Alan C. | 5 |
| Throne, John M. | 5 |
| Axelrod, Saul | 4 |
| Baer, Donald M. | 4 |
| Baxter, Douglas A. | 4 |
| Brent, George | 4 |
| Byrne, John H. | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Vermont | 9 |
| California | 4 |
| District of Columbia | 2 |
| Florida | 2 |
| India | 2 |
| Japan | 2 |
| Mozambique | 2 |
| New York | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| United Kingdom (Wales) | 2 |
| Alabama | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tiberius, Richard G. – Interchange, 1974
Descriptors: Behavior, Behavior Change, Conditioning, Learning
Nakamura, Charles Y. – J Exp Child Psychol, 1969
Research supported in whole by Public Health Service Grant HD-00908 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Operant Conditioning, Reinforcement, Responses
Woods, Thomas S. – 1980
The notion of differentially reinforcing low rates of undesirable behavior (DRL) is examined. Further, the status of the full session DRL strategy as alternative to punishment is questioned in context of a strictly operant definition of punishment. A reexamination of the data from some studies reveals the possibility that Ss respond to said DRL…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Behavior Problems, Operant Conditioning, Punishment
Throne, John M. – 1971
The differences between the authors of the Coleman report and their critics make clear why the effectiveness of schools will always remain controversial as long as inferential statistics are employed to determine it. Controversy is inevitable when measurement requires the satisfaction of assumptions antithetical to the teaching processes through…
Descriptors: Educational Responsibility, Learning Processes, Operant Conditioning, Teacher Effectiveness
Vance, Hubert R. – Academic Therapy, 1978
The author cautions against indiscriminate use of behavior modification by untrained professionals. (CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Handicapped Children, Legal Problems, Operant Conditioning
Peer reviewedPrimus, Michael A.; Thompson, Gary – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1985
An operant conditioning discrimination paradigm was evaluated of relationships between response behavior of young children and two stimulus components of the paradigm, the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcing stimulus. Findings revealed the effects of schedules of reinforcement, novel reinforcement, and age. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Audiometric Tests, Disabilities, Infants
Today's Education, 1972
In contrast to the traditional view that maladaptive behaviors are surface manifestations of underlying emotional disturbances, the behavior modification approach assumes that such behaviors are simply learned ways of adjusting to the environment and are determined by the consequences that follow them. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Classroom Environment, Mental Health, Operant Conditioning
Peer reviewedRugel, Robert P.; And Others – American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1971
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Children, Operant Conditioning, Physical Disabilities
Peer reviewedBednar, Richard L.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1970
This study on operant conditioning showed that both groups showed significant improvement in reading skills from pretest to posttest, but that the reinforced group showed significantly more improvement than the nonreinforced group. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Delinquency, Learning, Operant Conditioning
Peer reviewedSattler, Howard E.; Swoope, Karen S. – Psychology in the Schools, 1970
A primary purpose of the token system is to expand the operant model in order to provide a broader reinforcement base. The ten procedural considerations necessary for implementing a token system are presented. Beyond this, fundamental knowledge of operant principles remains essential in order to apply the token system correctly. (Author/KJ)
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Operant Conditioning, Reinforcement, Rewards
Peer reviewedBoles, Shawn – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1990
The paper discusses the iterative nature of problem solving; operant analysis of the response repertoire available in a problem situation; the likelihood of reaching a solution versus escaping from the situation; and the relationship between exiting with solution and exiting without solution, modeled on catastrophe theory. (JDD)
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Models, Operant Conditioning
Miller, Ronald Mellado; Capaldi, E. John – Learning and Motivation, 2006
Sequential theory's memory model of learning has been successfully applied in response contingent instrumental conditioning experiments (Capaldi, 1966, 1967, 1994; Capaldi & Miller, 2003). However, it has not been systematically tested in nonresponse contingent Pavlovian conditioning experiments. The present experiments attempted to determine if…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Training, Experiments, Probability
Maes, J. H. R.; van der Goot, M. – Learning and Motivation, 2006
This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to…
Descriptors: Operant Conditioning, Students, Responses, Positive Reinforcement
Kearney, Albert J. – Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2006
Covert sensitization is the first of a family of behavior therapy procedures called covert conditioning initially developed by Joseph Cautela in the 1960s and 1970s. The covert conditioning procedures involve the use of visualized imagery and are designed to work according to operant conditioning principles. When working with cooperative clients…
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Conditioning, Stimuli, Operant Conditioning
Franklin, Diane E.; Taylor, Catherine L.; Hennessey, Neville W.; Beilby, Janet M. – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2008
Background: Response-contingent time-out has been shown to be an effective technique for enhancing fluency in people who stutter. However, the factors that determine individual responsiveness to time-out are not well understood. Aims: The study investigated the effectiveness of using response-contingent time-out to reduce stuttering frequency in…
Descriptors: Stuttering, Operant Conditioning, Timeout, Severity (of Disability)

Direct link
