Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 5 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
| International Journal for… | 5 |
Author
| Alla Anohina-Naumeca | 1 |
| Arnold Y. L. Wong | 1 |
| Bryony N. Parsons | 1 |
| Celeste Pilegard | 1 |
| Curtis C. H. Yu | 1 |
| Debora Weber-Wulff | 1 |
| Dino Samartzis | 1 |
| Elizabeth M. Shanks | 1 |
| Fadi Al Zoubi | 1 |
| Gail D. Heyman | 1 |
| Heather Johnston | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (Liverpool) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Debora Weber-Wulff; Alla Anohina-Naumeca; Sonja Bjelobaba; Tomáš Foltýnek; Jean Guerrero-Dib; Olumide Popoola; Petr Šigut; Lorna Waddington – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Recent advances in generative pre-trained transformer large language models have emphasised the potential risks of unfair use of artificial intelligence (AI) generated content in an academic environment and intensified efforts in searching for solutions to detect such content. The paper examines the general functionality of detection tools for…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Identification, Man Machine Systems, Accuracy
Lancaster, Thomas – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Text generation tools, often presented as a form of generative artificial intelligence, have the potential to pose a threat to the integrity of the educational system. They can be misused to afford students marks and qualifications that they do not deserve. The emergence of recent tools, such as ChatGPT, appear to have left the educational…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Integrity, Educational Technology
Tal Waltzer; Celeste Pilegard; Gail D. Heyman – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
The release of ChatGPT in 2022 has generated extensive speculation about how Artificial Intelligence (AI) will impact the capacity of institutions for higher learning to achieve their central missions of promoting learning and certifying knowledge. Our main questions were whether people could identify AI-generated text and whether factors such as…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Natural Language Processing, College Students
Heather Johnston; Rebecca F. Wells; Elizabeth M. Shanks; Timothy Boey; Bryony N. Parsons – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
The aim of this project was to understand student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies such as Chat generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in order to inform changes to the University of Liverpool Academic Integrity code of practice. The survey for this study was created by a library student team and vetted…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Universities
Jae Q. J. Liu; Kelvin T. K. Hui; Fadi Al Zoubi; Zing Z. X. Zhou; Dino Samartzis; Curtis C. H. Yu; Jeremy R. Chang; Arnold Y. L. Wong – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing has raised concerns regarding accuracy, ethics, and scientific rigour. Some AI content detectors may not accurately identify AI-generated texts, especially those that have undergone paraphrasing. Therefore, there is a pressing need for efficacious approaches or guidelines to…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Investigations, Identification, Human Factors Engineering

Peer reviewed
Direct link
