Descriptor
| Educational Objectives | 11 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 11 |
| National Competency Tests | 11 |
| National Programs | 11 |
| Educational Assessment | 5 |
| Educational Change | 4 |
| Educational Improvement | 4 |
| Test Use | 4 |
| Testing Problems | 4 |
| Testing Programs | 4 |
| Accountability | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ameziane, Ahmed | 1 |
| Beaton, Albert E. | 1 |
| Hausman, Jerome | 1 |
| Hogan, Thomas P. | 1 |
| Johnson, Sylvia T. | 1 |
| Koretz, Daniel M. | 1 |
| Lietz, Jeremy J. | 1 |
| Pipho, Chris | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Morocco | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Department of Education, Washington, DC. – 1991
"America 2000" is a national strategy (not a federal program) designed to accomplish in 9 years the six national education goals first articulated by the President and the state governors at the 1989 "Education Summit" in Charlottesville, Virginia. America 2000 is described as having four major "parts," and this…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Innovation, Educational Objectives, Educational Strategies
Department of Education, Washington, DC. – 1991
"America 2000" is a long-term national strategy (not a federal program) designed to accomplish in nine years (by the year 2000) the six national education goals articulated by the President and the state governors at the 1989 "Education Summit" in Charlottesville, Virginia. This national education strategy was presented by the…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Innovation, Educational Objectives, Educational Strategies
Department of Education, Washington, DC. – 1991
"America 2000" is a national strategy (not a federal program) designed to accomplish in nine years the six national education goals first articulated by the president and the state governors at the 1989 "Education Summit" in Charlottesville, Virginia. America 2000 is described as having four major "parts," and this…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Innovation, Educational Objectives, Educational Strategies
Pipho, Chris – 1992
In recent months the idea of a single national test seems to have lost some of its momentum, while use of national standards to which voluntary regional or state tests would be indexed seems to have gained support. Nationally, there does not seem to be any organized attempt to fuse the national education goals into the state process beyond the…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewedHausman, Jerome – Art Education, 1994
Asserts that the current national standards movement is a broadly based discussion and debate about what art educators hope to and should accomplish through their work. Reviews the origins and process of developing national art education standards. (CFR)
Descriptors: Art Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Objectives
Beaton, Albert E. – 1992
Neither teacher-made tests nor the Scholastic Aptitude Test are appropriate for measuring the attainment of national education goals. Most practitioners involved in discussions of national high-stakes examinations argue that new tests are needed. A new system that preserves state and local autonomy in education as it measures the attainment of…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives
Quality Education for Minorities Network, Washington, DC. – 1992
Although the national education goals announced in February 1990 were influenced by the goals defined by the Quality Education for Minorities Project, the recommendations of the project did not influence the administration's America 2000 strategy for achieving the goals. America 2000 does not address the problems that make it almost impossible for…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Change, Educational Objectives
Hogan, Thomas P. – 1992
Reflections on the proposal for creation and implementation of a national test are presented from the perspective of a test author. The most readily identified characteristic of the proposed national test is the intensity of debate surrounding it. Another easily identified characteristic is the anticipated effect. While proponents expect higher…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cost Effectiveness, Curriculum Development, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewedAmeziane, Ahmed; Lietz, Jeremy J. – Education, 1983
The kingdom of Morocco has developed an educational system that incorporates traditional customs and values of the people with the system of accountability practiced there under French colonial rule. A highly structured curriculum for each educational level is combined with a minimum competency requirement at each grade level. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Entrance Examinations, Competency Based Education, Developing Nations
Peer reviewedJohnson, Sylvia T. – Journal of Negro Education, 1991
Critiques the Bush Administration's "America 2000" education initiative, in particular the call for national testing as a major tool for student assessment and education reform. Discusses the difficulty of designing accurate instruments, the drain on resources for other needs, and the ineffectiveness of testing as an agent for reform.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Black Students, Black Youth, Educational Assessment
Koretz, Daniel M.; And Others – 1992
In January 1992, the National Council on Education Standards and Testing (NCEST) issued a report "Raising Standards for American Education," which called for the establishment of a national system of educational standards and assessments as a basis for comprehensive reform of U.S. education. This statement is a facsimile of the written…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Cost Effectiveness, Curriculum Development, Educational Assessment


