NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)4
Since 2007 (last 20 years)9
Audience
Researchers4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 76 to 90 of 120 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burton, Richard F. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2004
The standard error of measurement usefully provides confidence limits for scores in a given test, but is it possible to quantify the reliability of a test with just a single number that allows comparison of tests of different format? Reliability coefficients do not do this, being dependent on the spread of examinee attainment. Better in this…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Error of Measurement, Test Reliability, Test Items
Smith, Richard M. – 1982
There have been many attempts to formulate a procedure for extracting information from incorrect responses to multiple choice items, i.e., the assessment of partial knowledge. The results of these attempts can be described as inconsistent at best. It is hypothesized that these inconsistencies arise from three methodological problems: the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Goodness of Fit, Guessing (Tests)
Lowry, Stephen R. – 1977
The effects of luck and misinformation on ability of multiple-choice test scores to estimate examinee ability were investigated. Two measures of examinee ability were defined. Misinformation was shown to have little effect on ability of raw scores and a substantial effect on ability of corrected-for-guessing scores to estimate examinee ability.…
Descriptors: Ability, College Students, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jacobs, Stanley S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Response Style (Tests)
Cross, Lawrence H.; Frary, Robert B. – 1976
It has been demonstrated that corrected-for-guessing scores will be superior to number-right scores in providing estimates of examinee standing on the trait measured by a multiple-choice test, if it can be assumed that examinees can and will comply with the appropriate directions. The purpose of the present study was to test the validity of that…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Individual Characteristics, Multiple Choice Tests
Boldt, Robert F. – 1971
One formulation of confidence scoring requires the examinee to indicate as a number his personal probability of the correctness of each alternative in a multiple-choice test. For this formulation, a linear transformation of the logarithm of the correct response is maximized if the examinee reports accurately his personal probability. To equate…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aiken, Lewis R.; Williams, Newsom – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Seven formulas for scoring test items with two options (true-false or multiple choice with only two choices) were investigated. Several conditions, such as varying directions for guessing and whether testees had prior knowledge of the proportions of false items on the test were also investigated. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests
Wilcox, Rand R. – 1981
These studies in test adequacy focus on two problems: procedures for estimating reliability, and techniques for identifying ineffective distractors. Fourteen papers are presented on recent advances in measuring achievement (a response to Molenaar); "an extension of the Dirichlet-multinomial model that allows true score and guessing to be…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models
Powell, J. C. – 1980
Current Scoring practices for multiple-choice tests are rooted in early Associationist Theory and are based on a two-step procedure: (1) right answers counted as ones and wrong answers are zeros, and (2) number of right answers form a total-correct score. The author contends that if either step is invalid, the use of the general linear model (GLM)…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Logical Thinking, Multiple Choice Tests
Cross, Lawrence H. – 1975
A novel scoring procedure was investigated in order to obtain scores from a conventional multiple-choice test that would be free of the guessing component or contain a known guessing component even though examinees were permitted to guess at will. Scores computed with the experimental procedure are based not only on the number of items answered…
Descriptors: Algebra, Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cross, Lawrence; Frary, Robert – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
Corrected-for-guessing scores on multiple-choice tests depend upon the ability and willingness of examinees to guess when they have some basis for answering, and to avoid guessing when they have no basis. The present study determined the extent to which college students were able and willing to comply with formula-scoring directions. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Individual Characteristics, Multiple Choice Tests
Choppin, Bruce – Evaluation in Education: An International Review Series, 1985
During 1969 the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement began a series of cross-cultural studies to investigate the workings of multiple-choice achievement tests and student guessing behaviors. Empirical models to correct for guessing are discussed in terms of test item difficulty, number of response choices,…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cross Cultural Studies, Educational Testing, Guessing (Tests)
Lowry, Stephen R. – 1979
A specially designed answer format was used for three tests in a college level agriculture class of 19 students to record responses to three things about each item: (1) the student's choice of the best answer; (2) the degree of certainty with which the answer was chosen; and (3) all the answer choices which the student was certain were incorrect.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education
Echternacht, Gary J.; And Others – 1971
This handbook presents instructions for implementing a confidence testing program in technical training situations, identification of possible areas of application, techniques for evaluating confidence information, advantages and disadvantages of confidence testing, time considerations, and problem areas. Complete instructions for "Pick-One" and…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Educational Diagnosis, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques
Rippey, Robert M. – 1972
This paper examines confidence testing, and reasons for using confidence tests. Different scoring systems are studied in order to clarify the meaning of significance of the weights which subjects assign to confidence scored tests. (DLG)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Decision Making, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8