NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koehler, Roger A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
The purposes of the study were to develop a measure of overconfidence on probabilistic tests, to assess the measurement characteristics of such a measure, and to investigate the relationship of overconfidence on tests to knowledge and to risk-taking propensity. (Author/BB)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Risk
Jacobs, Stanley S. – 1974
Investigated were the effects of two levels of penalty for incorrect responses on two dependent variables (a measure of risk-taking or confidence, based on nonsense items, and the number of response-attempts to legitimate items) for three treatment groups in a 2x3, multi-response repeated measures, multivariate ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) design.…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Suhadolnik, Debra; Weiss, David J. – 1983
The present study was an attempt to alleviate some of the difficulties inherent in multiple-choice items by having examinees respond to multiple-choice items in a probabilistic manner. Using this format, examinees are able to respond to each alternative and to provide indications of any partial knowledge they may possess concerning the item. The…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability, Response Style (Tests)
Koehler, Roger A. – 1974
A potentially valuable measure of overconfidence on probabilistic multiple-choice tests was evaluated. The measure of overconfidence was based on probabilistic responses to nonsense items embedded in a vocabulary test. The test was administered under both confidence response and conventional choice response directions to 208 undergraduate…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pugh, Richard C.; Brunza, J. Jay – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Personality
Stegman, Charles E. – 1973
Probabilistic testing involves having the examinee assign probabilities to each of the options of a multiple-choice item. These probabilities reflect the student's perception of the correctness of each option. What is presented in the paper is a rationale for probability testing, the current theoretical and empirical findings, and some suggested…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques
Gardner, Willie C., Jr. – 1970
The problems stated at the outset were: to discover whether information provided by confidence testing would result in a more accurate assessment of student knowledge so more personal individualized instruction could be presented, and whether sufficient precise data could be attained to be of significant aid in curriculum planning. Analysis has…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Curriculum Development, Individual Differences, Individualized Instruction
Landa, Suzanne – 1976
Instructions are provided on how to create and take computer aided admissible probability measurement (CAAPM) tests using programs available on PLATO IV. Admissible probability measurement is a testing procedure that permits a user to express a degree of uncertainty as to the correctness of alternative answers. Section II describes PLATO IV, an…
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Online Systems
Rippey, Robert M. – 1972
This paper examines confidence testing, and reasons for using confidence tests. Different scoring systems are studied in order to clarify the meaning of significance of the weights which subjects assign to confidence scored tests. (DLG)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Decision Making, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kansup, Wanlop; Hakstian, A. Ralph – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Effects of logically weighting incorrect item options in conventional tests and different scoring functions with confidence tests on reliability and validity were examined. Ninth graders took conventionally administered Verbal and Mathematical Reasoning tests, scored conventionally and by a procedure assigning degree-of-correctness weights to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Junior High School Students, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, A. Ralph; Kansup, Wanlop – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
A comparison of reliability and validity was made for three testing procedures: 1) responding conventionally to Verbal Ability and Mathematical Reasoning tests; 2) using a confidence weighting response procedure with the same tests; and 3) using the elimination response method. The experimental testing procedures were not psychometrically superior…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Junior High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rippey, Robert M.; Smith, Susan – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1979
Medical and dental students were administered two short confidence-scored tests on cellular and molecular biology. Increases in test reliability and predictive validity were found when test scores were adjusted for realism, but were not statistically significant. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Dental Schools, Higher Education, Medical Students
Pascale, Pietro J. – 1971
This brief review explains some alternate scoring procedures to the classical method of summing correct responses. The novel procedures attempt in some way to retrieve and use even the information in the wrong responses. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Computer Oriented Programs, Confidence Testing, Educational Diagnosis
Shuford, Emir H., Jr.; Brown, Thomas A. – 1974
A student's choice of an answer to a test question is a coarse measure of his knowledge about the subject matter of the question. Much finer measurement might be achieved if the student were asked to estimate, for each possible answer, the probability that it is the correct one. Such a procedure could yield two classes of benefits: (a) students…
Descriptors: Bias, Computer Programs, Confidence Testing, Decision Making