NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Poizner, Sharon B.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Binary, probability, and ordinal scoring procedures for multiple-choice items were examined. In two situations, it was found that both the probability and ordinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Lowry, Stephen R. – 1979
A specially designed answer format was used for three tests in a college level agriculture class of 19 students to record responses to three things about each item: (1) the student's choice of the best answer; (2) the degree of certainty with which the answer was chosen; and (3) all the answer choices which the student was certain were incorrect.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bethell-Fox, Charles E.; And Others – Intelligence, 1984
This study of individual differences in performance of a geometric analogies task included four-alternative test items and studied eye movements and confidence judgments as well as latency and error. Results were interpreted using two hypothesized performance strategies: constructive matching and response elimination. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Confidence Testing, Difficulty Level, Eye Movements
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Al-Hamly, Mashael; Coombe, Christine – Language Testing, 2005
This study investigates whether the practice of answer changing on multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is beneficial to Gulf Arab students' overall test performance. The proficiency exam used in this study is the Michigan English Language Institute College English Test - Grammar, Cloze, Vocabulary, Reading (MELICET-GCVR), which was developed using…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College English, Arabs, Multiple Choice Tests